Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 58, Issue 8
June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Corneal endothelial cell-based therapy: an evaluation of two different approaches; cell injection and tissue-engineered endothelial keratoplasty
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hon Shing Ong
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
    Corneal Service, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  • Maninder S Bhogal
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Yu-Chi Liu
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
    Corneal Service, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  • Heng-Pei Ang
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Xin-Yi Seah
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Khadijah Binte Adnan
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Gary S L Peh
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • Jodhbir Mehta
    Tissue Engineering and Stem Cell Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
    Corneal Service, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Hon Shing Ong, None; Maninder Bhogal, None; Yu-Chi Liu, None; Heng-Pei Ang, None; Xin-Yi Seah, None; Khadijah Adnan, None; Gary Peh, None; Jodhbir Mehta, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Research Foundation Translational and Clinical Research Programme Grant (NMRC/TCR/008-SERI/2013)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 1476. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hon Shing Ong, Maninder S Bhogal, Yu-Chi Liu, Heng-Pei Ang, Xin-Yi Seah, Khadijah Binte Adnan, Gary S L Peh, Jodhbir Mehta; Corneal endothelial cell-based therapy: an evaluation of two different approaches; cell injection and tissue-engineered endothelial keratoplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):1476.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Visual impairment from corneal endothelial dysfunction is an important indication for corneal transplantation. Global shortages of donor corneas limit the number of transplants performed, driving the search for alternative approaches. This study evaluated the functional outcomes of cell injection (CI) therapy and tissue-engineered endothelial keratoplasty (TE-EK) in a rabbit model of bullous keratopathy.

Methods : Primary human corneal endothelial cells (CEC) were isolated and propagated for 1-2 passage using the dual media culture approach. New Zealand white rabbits were used to assess functionality of CEC by cell injection and TE-EK. Cataract extraction was performed on investigated eyes 1 week prior to surgery. For CI, CEC were injected in medium containing Y-27632. Rabbit corneal endothelium was scraped from its Descemet’s membrane (DM) or DM was stripped. Approximately 6 X 105 CEC were injected into the anterior chamber. Rabbits were immediately positioned eyes down for 3 hours. For TE-EK surgery, a TE-EK graft was prepared at least 2 days before. Central 7mm of host DM was stripped. The graft was inserted as per standard Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. EK was also performed with carrier alone. Central corneal thickness(CCT) and corneal clarity were assessed weekly. Rabbits were sacrificed after 28 days. Excised corneas were analyzed (histology, immunohistochemistry, and scanning electron microscopy).

Results : In the TE-EK group, CCT increased to >1000μm in the first 4 days. This was followed by gradual thinning close to pre-operative CCT by the second week. Mean CCT were 476.7±62.6μm(day 21) and 457.1±79.6μm(day 28). An area of corneal clarity corresponding to the size of the graft was seen. In the CI group, CCT prior to injection was 389.3±54.5μm. Following CI, CCT increased to 636.7±333.9μm(day 1). This declined to 575.2±50.5μm(day 7), 588.0±53.0μm(day 14) and 438.3±19.0μm(day 21). Corneas remained clear to day 21. At day 28, graft rejection was seen and CCT increased to 1225.0±115.2μm. In control groups (DM stripping with CI or TE-EK without cells), CCT was >1000μm in the 28 day period.

Conclusions : Cultured CEC used in CI therapy and TE-EK restored corneal endothelial function by the third week in our model of bullous keratopathy. CI approach was associated with more inconsistencies in restoring corneal function compared to TE-EK.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×