June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Ocular motor nerve development in the presence and absence of extraocular muscle
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Suzanne Marie Michalak
    Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • Jong Park
    Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Mary Whitman
    Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Max Tischfield
    Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Elizabeth Engle
    Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Suzanne Michalak, None; Jong Park, None; Mary Whitman, None; Max Tischfield, None; Elizabeth Engle, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  S.M.M. and J.G.P. were supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Medical Research Fellows Program. M.C.W. is supported by the Harvard-Vision Clinical Scientist Development Program [5K12EY016335], the Knights Templar Eye Foundation [Career Starter Grant], and the Children’s Hospital Ophthalmology Foundation [Faculty Discovery Award].
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 2999. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Suzanne Marie Michalak, Jong Park, Mary Whitman, Max Tischfield, Elizabeth Engle; Ocular motor nerve development in the presence and absence of extraocular muscle. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):2999.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Spatially and temporally define ocular motor nerve development in the presence and absence of extraocular muscles (EOMs).

Methods : Myf5cre mice, which in the homozygous state lack EOMs, were crossed to an Isl:GFP reporter line to fluorescently label motor neuron cell bodies and axons. Embryonic day (E) 11.5 to E15.5 wildtype and Myf5cre/cre whole mount embryos or dissected orbits were imaged by confocal microscopy to visualize the developing oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens nerves in the presence and absence of EOMs. E18.5 brainstems were serially sectioned and stained for Islet1 to determine the fate of ocular motor neurons.

Results : At E11.5, all three ocular motor nerves in mutant embryos approach the orbit with a trajectory identical to that of wildtype. Subsequently, while wildtype nerves send terminal branches that contact target EOMs, the Myf5cre/cre ocular motor nerves fail to form terminal branches, regress, and their corresponding motor neurons die. Comparisons between mutant and wildtype embryos reveal unique aspects of trochlear and oculomotor nerve development.

Conclusions : We have delineated ocular motor nerve spatial and temporal development in unprecedented detail. We find that EOMs are not necessary for initial outgrowth and guidance of ocular motor axons from the brainstem to the orbit but are required for their terminal branching and survival. These data suggest that intermediate targets in the mesenchyme provide cues necessary for appropriate targeting of ocular motor axons to the orbit, while EOM cues are responsible for terminal branching and motor neuron survival.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×