June 2017
Volume 58, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2017
Causes and Outcome of Ocular Emergencies for Patients that Underwent Keratoplasty at a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tariq Almudhaiyan
    King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Tariq Almudhaiyan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2017, Vol.58, 5955. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tariq Almudhaiyan; Causes and Outcome of Ocular Emergencies for Patients that Underwent Keratoplasty at a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017;58(8):5955.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose : To determine the presenting complaints and presentation of patients at emergency unit that had Keratoplasty surgeries in the past and their outcome after management.

Methods : Patients attending emergency unit of King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia between January and December 2013 were study population. Charts of patients with history of keratoplasty were reviewed for age, gender, indication for keratoplasty, initial and final best corrected Snellen visual acuities, presenting symptoms, ocular status, and diagnosis at presentation to emergency

Results : One hundred and seventeen emergency visits of 124 post-keratoplasty patients were identified. Their mean age was 27.5 years and 63.7% were males. The most common indication for keratoplasty was keratoconus (75.8%). The presenting symptoms were pain (38.3%) and redness (34.9%). The mean interval between keratoplasty and emergency visit was 11 ±1.6 months. The diagnosis was graft rejection in 16 (13%) and wound dehiscence (11.3%). Sixty three (51 %) visits were related to sutures. In 12(9.7 %) patients, microbial Keratitis was noted. The final visual outcome after trauma management was 20/20 to 20/40 in 58 (46.8%), 20/50 to 20/200 in 41 (33.1%) of patients

Conclusions : Preoperative counselling for penetrating keratoplasty should include awareness of symptoms and signs of possible postoperative complications and consequences of delayed medical treatment. Early recognition and intervention of any sight threatening complications increases the chance of graft survival and improvement of vision

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2017 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Baltimore, MD, May 7-11, 2017.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.