Because
CASK is an X-linked gene and is therefore subject to X-linked random inactivation, two types of RGCs exist in
CASK(+/−) mutant mice, those which produce
CASK and those which do not. Differences in axonal diameter of
CASK+ and
CASK− RGCs should produce an increased variability in axonal diameter within the ON in these studies. We therefore measured the mean of deviation (how far on average all values are from the mean), which is a measure of variability of the axonal areas. Surprisingly, the mean deviation for the axonal area in
CASK(+/−) optic nerve is smaller than the wild type (
Supplementary Fig. S2) indicating a tighter distribution. Overall, the distribution of the area of individual axons was smaller but roughly parallel in
CASK(+/−) mice and their sex-matched wild-type littermate indicating random inactivation of deleted
CASK allele had no bearing on the development or health of individual axons (
Fig. 3C). Indeed, we have previously documented that
CASK promotes postnatal brain growth in a non-cell autonomous manner
24 (i.e.,
CASK+ and
CASK− cells are equally affected). We therefore tested if there is specific loss of only
CASK negative axons in
CASK(+/−) mice. Specific loss of axons from cells, which are
CASK negative will lead to an artificial skewing of RGCs toward being
CASK positive. To determine if such is the case, we blotted optic nerve homogenates for CASK, an axonal marker NFAA, and a general cellular marker tubulin-α (
Fig. 3H). Our data suggest that there is a slight reduction in NFAA, which did not reach a statistical significance. Our data thus indicate that the decrease in axonal count from toluidine blue–stained section may indeed be an overestimate due to omission of very small gauge atrophic axons. However, the CASK content within optic nerve was approximately 47%. Secondary selection of
CASK positive RGCs would have produced a favorable skewing of X-chromosome inactivation among RGCs.
36 Under such circumstances, we would not expect to see a decrease in CASK protein amount (
Fig. 3I). Therefore, our data suggest that ONH in
CASK(+/−) mice may not be due to specific loss of
CASK negative axons.