Clinical characteristics were collected and all study subjects underwent complete ophthalmologic examinations. Examinations included prism and alternate cover measurements in the six diagnostic positions of gaze; primary position at distance and near, up, down, right, and left gazes, as well as right and left head tilt positions. Ocular motility assessment for the oblique muscles was graded based on a subjective scale (0–4) of underaction (−) or overaction (+). SR overaction or contracture was defined by clinical criteria previously published as follows
18: a vertical deviation of 15 prism diopters (PD) or more in the primary position, equal or larger hypertropia with ipsilateral head tilt than with the eyes looking straight ahead, more than 5 PD hypertropia of the affected eye in gaze to the side of the SO palsy, hypertropia in all upgazes, and overaction of the contralateral SO muscle of +1 or more. The “net” hypertropia in ipsilateral gaze was defined as the difference between hypertropia in ipsilateral gaze and the primary position, which represented the tensile strength of the ipsilateral SR. Laterality of the paretic eye, fixation dominance, dissociated vertical deviation, and associated horizontal strabismus were also noted. Subjective torsion in the primary gaze was assessed with double Maddox rods. Objective ocular torsion was evaluated by fundus photographs obtained using KOWA VX-10 (Kowa Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and TRC-50IA (Topcon, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) fundus cameras using internal fixation. Based on the methods described by Kushner and Hariharan,
17 the direction of torsion and the number of degrees of rotation from horizontal plane were recorded. For analysis of torsion, we encountered objective torsion by measuring the relative position of the disc and fovea on fundus photographs. Inborn variation of the anatomic position of the disc and fovea was adjusted to determine the net angle of torsion in the paretic eye, which was measured by subtracting the fovea–disc angle of the contralateral eye. As the intereye difference of the fovea–disc angle in normal participants was observed in a range of 0.0° to 4.4° based on fundus photographs by Bixenman and von Noorden,
19 an intereye difference beyond this range was defined as net excyclotorsion or incyclotorsion. Quantification of compensatory head tilt posture was evaluated using clinical and photographic methods.
20 The presence of facial asymmetry was graded subjectively by two independent observers on full-face frontal photographs obtained while the subject fixated on a distant target at the primary position.