The holangiotic microcirculation of the mammalian retina usually is described as three parallel layers of microvessels with additional capillaries irrigating the nerve fiber layer.
4,5 Very little is known concerning the actual distribution of capillary flow within this complex network. Using confocal microscopy and 3D reconstruction of the microvessel arborescence on rodent retinas, we previously proposed a 3D model of the distribution of blood flow in the rodent eye.
6 This model suggested a serial organization of the blood flow from the superficial vascular plexus (SVP) to intermediary (IVP) and deep vascular plexus (DVP) with venous drainage emerging essentially from the DVP. The presence of a highly anastomotic DVP provided a straightforward explanation for the deep localization of venous collaterals following experimental retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
7 However, in larger eyes, close to the optic nerve the accumulation of ganglion cell axons elicits an additional microvascular network, the radial peripapillary capillaries (RPCs),
4,5 which modify this scheme to an unknown extent. Few detailed studies of the anatomic disposition of retinal capillaries of large mammals have been reported.
8–12 In vivo fluorescein angiography can resolve individual capillaries close to the vitreoretinal interface, yet does not provide reliable observation of deeper microvessels or of connecting vessels even in confocal mode.
13–15 The recent advent of in vivo imaging systems allowing segmentation of microvessel layers, such as adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy
14 or angio-optical coherence tomography (OCTA),
15–22 renewed the interest in the tridimensional disposition of human retinal microvessels. However, the yet limited resolution of OCTA impairs the analysis of the relationship between the layers. In particular, it is not known if these layers are arranged serially or in parallel. A serial organization would indicate that the blood flow successively traverses the three layers, while a parallel organization would suggest that each layer possesses its own arteriolar supply and venous drainage. Based on high resolution OCTA findings, a predominantly parallel organization has been suggested.
21 Such a pattern was described as superimposed hammocks. This refers to a vascular disposition in which a capillary bed (the hammock) would bridge the space between arterioles and venules (which would be the “supportive cables” of the hammock). Hence, each microvessel layer (SVP, IVP, DVP) would be one hammock, which would not be connected one to the other. Recently, connecting vessels between retinal microvessels layers were resolved by OCTA
22 paving the way toward an in vivo analysis of the flow distribution between layers, yet the presumed direction of the flow within these connecting vessels was not mentioned.