The anti-inflammatory effect of topically applied ME was observed on a number of clinicopathologic measures of inflammation (
Fig. 2). The observed amelioration of clinical symptoms by ME correlated with reduced signs of breakdown of the blood–ocular barrier. Inflammation during EIU is characterized by a breakdown of the blood–ocular barrier resulting in an increase of total protein content in the aqueous humor, and cellular infiltration of leukocytes into the anterior chamber of the eye.
34 ME ameliorated these aspects of EIU induced ocular inflammation, which is evident from the decreased leukocyte infiltration and protein concentrations in the aqueous humor of rat eyes (
Fig. 3). Elevated protein concentration in the aqueous humor is partially due to increased expression of various inflammatory markers by invading leukocytes. These proteins include cytokines, chemokines and PGE
2.
35 Aqueous humor analysis showed the presence of PGE
2 at 6 hours after LPS injection (
Fig. 4). PGE
2 expression is thought to be part of the cascade that breaks down the blood–ocular barrier, since earlier studies have paralleled the rise in protein in the aqueous humor with the rise of PGE
2 expression.
8 MMP-9 is also likely to be a part of this process since it cleaves type IV collagen in basement membranes and allows the extravasion of leukocytes from the circulatory system into the aqueous humor during uveitis.
10 We found that treatment with ME reduced PGE
2 as measured by ELISA (
Fig. 4) and qualitatively reduced immunostaining for MMP-9 (
Fig. 5E). Lower levels of these proteins, reduced overall protein levels ,and decreased numbers of infiltrating leukocytes all imply that ME treatment helps to maintain the blood-ocular barrier in EIU. However, protein levels decrease was not as pronounced as the infiltrating cells decrease (
Fig. 3). It is possible that regional vascular function is still compromised as seen in uveitis.
1,2 Increasing the concentrations of ME or including amino guanidine is suggestive. Corticosteroids may still be the mainstay of therapy; however, they are associated with well-established side effects. This regimen with the chelator has the potential to be a better safety and efficacious treatment.