As retinal degeneration progresses in rd10 mice, subretinal fluid typically accumulates and becomes pathological, first in smaller regions in the posterior pole (stage II) and then in extensive contiguous areas later in degeneration (stage III). For stage II rd10 mice, the amount of subretinal fluid varied with the conditions of light adaptation (
Figs. 3,
4). While subretinal fluid was clearly visible on OCT images captured from light-adapted animals, the amount was significantly reduced to the point of resolution (as in examples shown in
Fig. 3B) following overnight dark-adaptation, indicating that RPE is capable to remove excess fluid in subretinal space even in this stage of retinal degeneration. The light-dependent OCT changes in stage II rd10 mice also indicate that there are still residual functional photoreceptors persisting in the retina.
18,32 On the other hand, the removal of excess fluid by dark-adaptation for stage II rd10 mice is not complete as the slope of light-dependent OCT response versus light-adapted outer retinal length is less than unity (
Figs. 3D,
4D). In addition, the slope decreases with the progress of retinal degeneration, from 0.84 for P32 to P35 mice shown in
Figure 3D to 0.40 for P35 to P38 rd10 mice shown in
Figure 4D. With further retinal degenerations, stage III rd10 mice exhibited massive subretinal fluid (
Fig. 5). The amount of fluids accumulated under subretinal space did not change significantly under light- and dark-adapted conditions. It is likely that the number of residual photoreceptors at this stage of rd10 retina is insufficient to regulate fluid transport in RPE cells. As rod photoreceptors degenerate, cone progressively dominate photoreceptor response in rd10 retina. The contribution of cones to light-dependent OCT response is complicated by findings that GNAT1
−/− mice lack similar response
9 and do not show light-dependent water mobility changes in subretinal space.
14 Although there are substantial rod degeneration in rd10 retina early on, rods still outnumber cones for the time points for which the light response was evaluated, especially for stage I (P21–P26) eyes, making a rod contribution to the response still plausible.