Purchase this article with an account.
Sunee Chansangpetch, Anwell Nguyen, Marta Mora, Mai Badr, Mingguang He, Travis C. Porco, Shan C. Lin; Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameters Obtained From Swept-Source Fourier-Domain and Time-Domain Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(3):1554-1561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23574.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
To assess the interdevice agreement between swept-source Fourier-domain and time-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).
Fifty-three eyes from 41 subjects underwent CASIA2 and Visante OCT imaging. One hundred eighty–degree axis images were measured with the built-in two-dimensional analysis software for the swept-source Fourier-domain AS-OCT (CASIA2) and a customized program for the time-domain AS-OCT (Visante OCT). In both devices, we examined the angle opening distance (AOD), trabecular iris space area (TISA), angle recess area (ARA), anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber width (ACW), and lens vault (LV). Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation (ICC) were performed. Orthogonal linear regression assessed any proportional bias.
ICC showed strong correlation for LV (0.925) and ACD (0.992) and moderate agreement for ACW (0.801). ICC suggested good agreement for all angle parameters (0.771–0.878) except temporal AOD500 (0.743) and ARA750 (nasal 0.481; temporal 0.481). There was a proportional bias in nasal ARA750 (slope 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95–3.18), temporal ARA750 (slope 2.57, 95% CI: 2.04–3.40), and nasal TISA500 (slope 1.30, 95% CI: 1.12–1.54). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated in all measured parameters a minimal mean difference between the two devices (−0.089 to 0.063); however, evidence of constant bias was found in nasal AOD250, nasal AOD500, nasal AOD750, nasal ARA750, temporal AOD500, temporal AOD750, temporal ARA750, and ACD. Among the parameters with constant biases, CASIA2 tends to give the larger numbers.
Both devices had generally good agreement. However, there were proportional and constant biases in most angle parameters. Thus, it is not recommended that values be used interchangeably.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only