The size of the optic disc, optic cup, and parapapillary gamma zone were measured on the optic disc photographs by using Image J software (version 1.43u; developed by Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available in the public domain at
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html). In the region of the parapapillary gamma zone, the large choroidal vessels and the sclera were clearly visible. The parapapillary gamma zone had round borders with the adjacent alpha zone on its peripheral side and with the peripapillary ring of the optic disc on its central side (
Fig. 1). The parapapillary gamma zone was differentiated from the parapapillary alpha zone, which had an irregular hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation and was adjacent to the retina on its outer side.
15,16 While studying the fundus photographs collected in the current study, the parapapillary gamma zone could not be clearly differentiated from the parapapillary beta zone, which had previously been defined by visible sclera and visible large choroidal vessels prior to the introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) into clinical ophthalmology.
16 With the help of the OCT technology, the (old) beta zone could then be differentiated into a (new) beta zone, characterized by the presence of Bruch's membrane without the retinal pigment epithelium, and into the parapapillary gamma zone without Bruch's membrane.
1,2 Subsequent studies revealed that the new OCT-defined beta zone was associated predominantly with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to only a minor degree, if at all, with axial elongation.
1,2 The gamma zone was strongly correlated with axial elongation, and it was not significantly associated with glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
1,2 In our study, the parapapillary area with visible sclera was, therefore, considered to be the parapapillary gamma zone, because none of the study participants had glaucoma. An additional reason was that the newly defined beta zone occurs only rarely in children and adolescents.
17 Magnification by the optic media of the eye was corrected by applying the method of Littmann and using axial length measurements.
18,19 To calculate Littmann's magnification factor, we applied the formula of (Axial Length [mm] − 1.82)/21.92. It was calculated for each fundus image separately, because axial length was elongated significantly (22.7 ± 0.8 mm versus 24.1 ± 1.1 mm;
P < 0.001) during the study period. In contrast, the corneal curvature radius did not change significantly (7.82 ± 0.25 mm versus 7.83 ± 0.25 mm;
P = 0.11). Correspondingly, Littmann's factor increased significantly (from 0.95 ± 0.04 mm to 1.02 ± 0.05 mm;
P < 0.001). The measurements were carried out by a trained ophthalmologist (YG) in a masked manner without knowledge of refractive error and axial length, and they were supervised by a panel of glaucoma specialists (LX, JBJ).