July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Preferred practice patterns among young retina specialists
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Angeline L. Wang
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
  • Jonathan Tsui
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
  • Hemang K. Pandya
    Retina Specialists, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Mitul C. Mehta
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Angeline Wang, None; Jonathan Tsui, None; Hemang Pandya, None; Mitul Mehta, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness Departmental Unrestricted Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 873. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Angeline L. Wang, Jonathan Tsui, Hemang K. Pandya, Mitul C. Mehta; Preferred practice patterns among young retina specialists. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):873.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose : To provide an overview of treatment preferences in a variety of medical and surgical retina topics among a group of young retina specialists.

Methods : An anonymous survey was conducted from Sept. to Nov. 2017 among members of the Young Retina Forum, an active WhatsApp group dedicated to retina case discussion made up of young medical and surgical retina specialists.

Results : Out of 44 respondents, 11% (5/44) were women and 89% (39/44) were men, including both medical retina (9% or 4/44) and surgical retina (91% or 40/44) specialists. The average age was 35.3 and average number of years in practice was 2.9. The median salary was between $300,000 and $399,000, with 67% (28/44) working in private practice, 27% (12/44) in academic institutions, and 9% (4/44) in HMOs. The majority of respondents preferred intravitreal bevacizumab as first-line treatment for foveal-involving diabetic macular edema (63%), vein occlusions (68%), and macular degeneration (66%). Aflibercept was a more popular choice in first-line diabetic macular edema patients with poor vision (43% or 19/44) compared to those with good vision (18% or 8/44). In cases of proliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema, most respondents prefer panretinal photocoagulation alone (61% or 27/44) or in combination with anti-VEGF (32% or 14/44) over anti-VEGF alone (7% or 3/44). Surgical retina respondents estimated that they repaired rhegmatogenous retinal detachments with vitrectomy alone 60% of the time, combined vitrectomy-buckle 20%, primary scleral buckle 10%, and pneumatic retinopexy 10%. Approximately half of surgical retina respondents (49% or 18/37) preferred scleral tunneled, non-sutured lenses over other secondary IOL placement methods.

Conclusions : Compared with previous data on retina practice patterns, including results of the ASRS Preferences and Trends Survey, our respondents were more likely to work in academic institutions, had fewer overall years in practice, made similar first-line medication choices in anti-VEGF therapy, and preferred similar techniques in repairing retinal detachments. Of note, despite recent studies showing that proliferative diabetic retinopathy can be treated successfully with anti-VEGF alone, the vast majority of respondents continue to prefer treatment with PRP.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.