July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Inheritance of peripheral refraction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dibyendu Pusti
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Antonio Benito
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Juan Francisco Sánchez-Romera
    Murcia Twin Registry, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Juan Ramón Ordoñana
    Murcia Twin Registry, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Pablo Artal
    Laboratorio de Optica, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Dibyendu Pusti, None; Antonio Benito, None; Juan Francisco Sánchez-Romera, None; Juan Ramón Ordoñana, None; Pablo Artal, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  MyFun, EU-ITN 675137, European Research Council Advanced Grant ERC-2013-AdG-339228 (SEECAT) & SEIDI, Spain (grant FIS2016-76163-R)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 1173. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dibyendu Pusti, Antonio Benito, Juan Francisco Sánchez-Romera, Juan Ramón Ordoñana, Pablo Artal; Inheritance of peripheral refraction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):1173.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose : Since peripheral refraction is different in myopes and emmetropes, it has been suggested as a possible precursor for myopia development. While several studies already showed a genetic impact in central myopia, there are no studies on inheritance of peripheral refraction. To better understand this issue, we compared the peripheral refraction profiles between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins.

Methods : 35 MZ twins (age:21.7±2.4 years) and 38 DZ twins (age: 21.3±2.5 years) were included in this study. Central refraction was measured using the Visual Adaptive Optics visual simulator (VAO; Voptica SL, Murcia, Spain). Peripheral refraction was evaluated using an open-view peripheral wave-front sensor (Voptica SL, Murcia, Spain). Three horizontal scans (±35°) were obtained in each eye for central and ±20° vertical fixations. We compared the spherical equivalent (SE) at the line of sight (LOS; 1 data point), central area (Central: ranging from 11° nasal up to 20° temporal; 32 data points), and rest of peripheral areas (Peripheral: included central beyond 20° and both superior & inferior scans; 172 data points). Differences between siblings were obtained from one randomly selected eye.

Results : Similar average LOS, Central and Peripheral SE were found for MZ (–2.0±1.8D, –2.2±1.7D and –2.6±1.4D), and DZ (–2.2±2.2D, –2.3±2.1D and –2.7±1.8D) twin groups. But average difference in SE between DZ siblings were above 0.7 D (p<0.01) at the three considered zones. Intraclass correlations of SE at the LOS, Central and Peripheral areas were higher in MZ (>0.85) than in DZ (<0.7) group.

Conclusions : Despite individual variability and having similar average SE throughout the retina, the MZ siblings showed a more similar overall refraction than DZ couples. Higher correlation between MZ at the three retinal areas considered; indicates the variance in SE was likely driven by a combination of genetic and shared environmental factors.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.