July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Comparison of central corneal thickness between optical and ultrasound pachymeters in glaucoma patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sören Waibel
    Universitätsaugenklinik Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Karin R Pillunat
    Universitätsaugenklinik Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Eberhard Spoerl
    Universitätsaugenklinik Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Lutz E Pillunat
    Universitätsaugenklinik Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sören Waibel, None; Karin Pillunat, None; Eberhard Spoerl, None; Lutz Pillunat, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 2017. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sören Waibel, Karin R Pillunat, Eberhard Spoerl, Lutz E Pillunat; Comparison of central corneal thickness between optical and ultrasound pachymeters in glaucoma patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):2017.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Numerous studies in healthy subjects have demonstrated that central corneal thickness (CCT) is thicker when measured with ultrasound pachymetry compared to optical pachymetry. The aim of this study was to evaluate to which extent these findings may be valid for glaucoma patients.

Methods : 41 glaucoma patients (69 eyes) as well as 32 age-matched (51 eyes) and 25 younger controls (50 eyes) were included in this prospective comparative study. CCT measurements were performed using the following techniques: ultrasound pachymetry (UP, Pachy Meter SP 3000, TOMEY), noncontact specular microscopy (SM, CEM-530 NIDEK Specular Microscope) and the Pentacam Scheimpflug technique (PC, OCULUS Pentacam® HR 70900).
A linear mixed model with repeated measures was used to determine whether the mean values of CCT measured with the three types of measurement technique differed significantly. The inclusion of both eyes of some individuals were considered as a random factor in the model. The level of concordance was assessed using Bland–Altman plots.

Results : In young healthy subjects (mean age 27.2 ± 4.8 years) mean CCT taken with UP, SM, and PC was (mean ± standard error) 566.1 ± 5.9 µm, 561.0 ± 5.9 µm, and 555.6 ± 5.9 µm, respectively. These values were significantly different (UP>SM>PC, P< 0.01). In glaucoma patients (mean age 65.0 ± 11.1 years), CCT was significantly thinner compared to both healthy groups (P< 0.001), without significant differences between the devices (UP 521.6 ± 4.7 µm; SM 524.0 ± 4.7 µm; PC 521.9 ± 4.7 µm). In age-matched healthy subjects (mean age 70.6 ± 10.7 years), CCT measured with UP (564.8 ± 5.3 µm) as well as with SM (562.4 ± 5.3 µm) was significantly thicker than with PC (549.8 ± 5.3 µm, P< 0.001). The difference between UP and SM was not statistically significant different in this group (P= 0.271).

Conclusions : The study verifies that ultrasound pachymeters measure CCT thicker than optical pachymeters in young healthy subjects. This difference between UP and SM is no longer observed in age-matched subjects and is even reversed in glaucoma patients. CCT in glaucoma patients is generally thinner than in healthy subjects, without significant differences between the measurement techniques. This could be explained by a higher ultrasound velocity of the cornea in glaucoma patients.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×