July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Dissecting Rod and Cone Inputs to OFF Transient Alpha Ganglion Cells
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christophe Ribelayga
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Nange Jin
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Lian-Ming Tian
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Zhijing Zhang
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Eduardo Silveyra
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Iris Fahrenfort
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Friso Potsma
    Neurobiology, Harvard University Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Paul David
    Neurobiology, Harvard University Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Stephen C Massey
    Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Christophe Ribelayga, None; Nange Jin, None; Lian-Ming Tian, None; Zhijing Zhang, None; Eduardo Silveyra, None; Iris Fahrenfort, None; Friso Potsma, None; Paul David, None; Stephen Massey, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants EY018640, EY006515, and EY028102), the Hermann Eye Fund and an Unrestricted Challenge Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 2585. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christophe Ribelayga, Nange Jin, Lian-Ming Tian, Zhijing Zhang, Eduardo Silveyra, Iris Fahrenfort, Friso Potsma, Paul David, Stephen C Massey; Dissecting Rod and Cone Inputs to OFF Transient Alpha Ganglion Cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):2585.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Rod signals can reach retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) through different pathways. It has been proposed that the primary rod bipolar cell [RBC] pathway is the most sensitive and that the secondary (rod-to-cone) pathway operates under intermediate (mesopic) lighting conditions. However, this has never been demonstrated. In addition, the contribution of the tertiary (rod-to-OFF BC) pathway to RGCs remains unknown. Here, we sought to determine the contribution of the different rod and cone inputs to one specific RGC type: the OFF transient alpha RGC (tOFFa RGC), chosen because the primary pathway can be blocked with APB.

Methods : We used mice that lack connexinCx36 (Cx36) specifically in cones or in rods and therefore a secondary rod pathway. Isolated retinas were maintained by perfusion and the light responses of single alpha RGCs were recorded using a loose-patch technique. tOFFa RGCs were identified based on (i) light responses and (ii) morphology and stratification following neurobiotin injection and histochemistry.

Results : In WT littermates, tOFFa RGC threshold was ~ 0.001 R*/rod/s (1 photoisomerization per 1,000 rods/s). Application of APB, an mGluR6 agonist that selectively blocks the primary rod pathway shifted the response-intensity curve by ~ 2 log units to the right, consistent with the primary rod pathway being the most sensitive pathway. In the cone-specific Cx36 knock out, tOFFa RGCs had the same sensitivity, suggesting the primary rod pathway was unchanged. However, APB caused a rightward shift of ~ 3 log units due to the block of the primary pathway by APB combined with the absence of the secondary rod pathway. We do not have a selective tool to block the tertiary rod pathway. However, we can estimate the cone threshold by recording from ON alpha RGCs in the pan-Cx36 knock out mice, which have no primary pathway due to the absence of AII/bipolar gap junctions and no secondary pathway due to the absence of rod/cone gap junctions. ON bipolar cells do not make direct contacts with rods so there is no tertiary ON pathway. This approach yielded the cone threshold at ~ 30 R*/rod/s.

Conclusions : tOFFa RGCs receive convergent inputs from all rod and cone pathways. The inputs have different thresholds with the threshold of the primary rod pathway (~ 0.001 R*/rod/s) < secondary (~ 0.1 R*/rod/s) < tertiary (~ 1 R*/rod/s) < cone pathway (~ 30 R*/rod/s).

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×