July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Canadian Ophthalmic Practitioners Ergonomics (COPE) Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Femida Kherani
    University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    University of British Colombia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Amin Kherani
    University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Emi Sanders
    Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Lorne Bellan
    University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Femida Kherani, None; Amin Kherani, None; Emi Sanders, None; Lorne Bellan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 4157. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Femida Kherani, Amin Kherani, Emi Sanders, Lorne Bellan; Canadian Ophthalmic Practitioners Ergonomics (COPE) Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):4157.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To assess ergonomics in Canadian ophthlamology practices, and to evaluate the impact of Electronic medical record systems on musculoskeletal discomfort.

Methods : This project was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board. A 25 question survey was distributed to the current mailing lists of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS), The Canadian Orthoptic Council (COC) , and the Canadian members of the Joint Commission for Allied Health Personnel in Ophthalmology (JCAHPO) listservs. The survey was open for four weeks, and a reminder email sent after 2 weeks to the entire mailing list. Data was collected on respondent demographics, practice history, use of an electronic medical record (EMR), workplace discomfort, and ergonomic consideration and implementation in the clinic, operating room and administrative areas.

Results : 317 completed surveys were returned, 142 from surgeons (44.8%) and 174 from allied health (54.9%) and one not indicating role. Within the surgeon cohort, 94 were male (66.2%), on average been in practice for 18.9 years (range=0-61, SD=13.5), and worked an average of 46 hours per week (r=3-100, SD=15). Within the Allied Health cohort, 9.8% were male (N=17), having worked an average of 15.8 years (r=0=45, SD=11.0) and a 36 hour work week (r=2-85, sd=11.0). 195 (72%) use an EMR, and of those who do, 76.9% (N=150) report some workplace discomfort, 35.4% (n=69) worse discomfort with an EMR. 61.2% (n=189) report increased workplace challenges with an EMR, and 78.2% (250) report ergonomics are important or very important consideration in their practice. Challenges to the workplace with EMRs were noted to include positioning of keyboard/computer to the patient, appropriate attention and eye contact with patients and difficulty maintaining good ergonomics along with others.

Conclusions : Within our survey, only 23.1% of respondents noted no workplace discomfort, with 61.2% (189) indicating that EMR have added challenges to ergonomics. Though changes are being considered within the clinic, operating rooms and administrative areas, workplace discomfort is still present and challenges exist. This study demonstrates the prevalence of workplace discomfort and highlights some of the challenges of our work.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×