July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
MACULAR HOLE AFTER RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rayan Alshareef
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY, CALGARY, Alberta, Canada
  • Nastaran Nashki
    Medical school, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Geoff Williams
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY, CALGARY, Alberta, Canada
  • Amin Kherani
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY, CALGARY, Alberta, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rayan Alshareef, None; Nastaran Nashki, None; Geoff Williams, None; Amin Kherani, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 4252. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rayan Alshareef, Nastaran Nashki, Geoff Williams, Amin Kherani; MACULAR HOLE AFTER RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):4252.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To describe the clinical characteristics of and risk factors for the development of full thickness macular hole (MH) after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.

Methods : Methods: Retrospective case-control study from July 2004 to September 2017. Medical and surgical records of 5123 patients were reviewed. A total of 27 patients who underwent repair of RRD with subsequent development of a full thickness MH were identified and compared to 63 age- and gender-matched control patients undergoing repair for RRD. Clinical features of patients who developed MM after RRD repair and analysis of potential risk factors (age, type of retinal detachment, surgical technique, phakic status, refractive error, subsequent cataract surgery and the presence of cystoid macular edema, an epiretinal membrane and lattice degeneration).

Results : The average time to presentation for post RRD MH was 85.2 days. 81.8 ± 4 % of these MH presented with macula off detachments. Post-RRD MH have had more surgeries pre-MH development, more likely to be pseudophakic, have cystoid macular edema, lattice degeneration and epiretinal membranes.

Conclusions : Conclusions: Macular hole after primary RRD is rare but potentially limits visual improvement. Although the cause is often unclear, young age, epiretinal membrane formation, lattice degeneration and cataract extraction may be contributing risk factors in some eyes.

Macular hole after primary RRD is rare but potentially limits visual improvement. Although the cause is often unclear tractional forces around fovea, young age, cystoid macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane formation, lattice degeneration and cataract extraction may be contributing risk factors in some eyes.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×