Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 59, Issue 9
July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Economic impact of Keratoconus -a patient’s perspective
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Srujana Sahebjada
    Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Elsie Chan
    Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Sara Vogrin
    St. Vincent’s Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Vijaya Sundararajan
    St. Vincent’s Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Mark Daniell
    Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Paul N. Baird
    Ophthalmology, Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Srujana Sahebjada, None; Elsie Chan, None; Sara Vogrin, None; Vijaya Sundararajan, None; Mark Daniell, None; Paul Baird, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  This project was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Research Excellence grant 529923 - Translational Clinical Research in Major Eye Diseases, NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship 1028444 (PNB), Lions Eye Donation Service, Angior Family Foundation and Lynne Quayle Charitable Trust. The Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian Government. The sponsor or funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 4399. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Srujana Sahebjada, Elsie Chan, Sara Vogrin, Vijaya Sundararajan, Mark Daniell, Paul N. Baird; Economic impact of Keratoconus -a patient’s perspective. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):4399.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Unlike other common chronic ocular diseases, keratoconus (KC) primarily affects people in their teens and early adulthood extending through adulthood. There have been no studies evaluating the economic costs from a patient’s perspective. Hence, we conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the economic cost associated with KC and estimate the lifetime cost associated with the disease.

Methods : KC patients were recruited from public and private ophthalmology clinics in Melbourne, Australia. A keratoconus health expenditure questionnaire was designed to assess direct and indirect expenditures by these subjects. The participants completed this questionnaire, by referring to their bills or receipts, where possible. All analyses were performed using Stata 13.2.

Results : A total of 100 participants completed the questionnaire with a median age of 31 years [interquartile range (IQR) 23, 44] and 57% were males. The median and IQR for the total out of pocket cost of spectacles, contact lenses, contact lens solutions, eye drops and other equipment was AUD$ 1087.50 (650, 1885) per year; the cost of health visits to optometrists/ophthalmologists, hospital and other health services was AUD$ 378 (100, 1779); the cost of transportation to health visits was AUD$ 125 (45-300). The total cost related to direct and indirect care was AUD$ 3365 (2110, 8930).
The mean cost per KC subject per year was approximately AUD $4398 while the average household optician expenditure was $145 per annum (Australian households report 2008). This suggests they are paying 30-fold more than the general population.
By applying our cost data to the estimated keratoconus prevalence (1 in 2000) data for the Australian population, the total cost is approximately AUD$ 40.5 million per year in Australia.

Conclusions : Our results show that the costs associated with keratoconus diagnosis and management represent a significant cost to both patients and the health system. Most keratoconus patients are distinctly disadvantaged by current Australian government rebate and private health insurance policies and incur high out-of-pocket expenses involved with the treatment and management of the disease. With the increasing prevalence of keratoconus and the fact that we are seeing keratoconus affecting people at a much younger age in recent years, the study results highlight keratoconus as a public health concern.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×