July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Safety evaluation of transcorneal electrical stimulation as an examination of patient selection for retinal prosthesis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Toru Saito
    Artificial Retina Development Office, Development Div., NIDEK CO.,LTD., Gamagori, Aichi, Japan
  • Hiroyuki Kanda
    Department of Applied Visual Science, Osaka university Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
  • Yukari Nakano
    Artificial Vision Institute, R&D Div., NIDEK CO.,LTD., Gamagori, Aichi, Japan
  • Yasuo Terasawa
    Artificial Vision Institute, R&D Div., NIDEK CO.,LTD., Gamagori, Aichi, Japan
  • Koji Osawa
    Artificial Retina Development Office, Development Div., NIDEK CO.,LTD., Gamagori, Aichi, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Toru Saito, NIDEK CO.,LTD (E); Hiroyuki Kanda, NIDEK Co.,Ltd. (F); Yukari Nakano, NIDEK CO.,LTD (E); Yasuo Terasawa, NIDEK CO.,LTD. (E); Koji Osawa, NIDEK CO.,LTD. (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 4563. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Toru Saito, Hiroyuki Kanda, Yukari Nakano, Yasuo Terasawa, Koji Osawa; Safety evaluation of transcorneal electrical stimulation as an examination of patient selection for retinal prosthesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):4563.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) is usually performed as a preoperative examination for the purpose of patient selection for Suprachoroidal-Transretinal Stimulation (STS) type retinal prosthesis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of TES.

Methods : Three rabbits were used in the present study. Custom-designed ERG electrode (Mayo Co., Japan) is comprised of two platinum rings (diameter, 13 mm and 17mm). The smaller ring and larger ring were used as stimulating and return electrode respectively. The electrode was put on the corneal surface. Anodic-first charge-balanced biphasic pulses (10 ms/phase and 20 pulses/s of pulse frequency) were applied to the cornea. The stimulus intensity was 2.6 mA, which was 30% higher than the maximum intensity of ordinary TES examination. We then applied continuous stimulation for 300 seconds, which was 10 times longer in comparison to ordinary TES examination. Slit-lamp examination was performed just before the stimulation and 1 hour, 3 days, and 7 days after stimulation. We then enucleated the eyeballs and conducted histological examination by HE staining.

Results : We did not observe any significant change in cornea or conjunctiva through the slit-lamp examination at all time intervals after the stimulation in all three animals. Moreover, histological examination did not reveal any corneal damage.

Conclusions : These results indicated that there was little possibility of corneal or conjunctival damage by TES examination. Therefore, it could be concluded that TES examination is safe.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×