July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
A Systematic Review of Educational Interventions for Cataract Surgery Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ariel R. Choi
    Department of Ophthalmology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
    Program in Liberal Medical Education, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
  • Paul B. Greenberg
    Department of Ophthalmology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
    Section of Ophthalmology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ariel Choi, None; Paul Greenberg, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 4801. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ariel R. Choi, Paul B. Greenberg; A Systematic Review of Educational Interventions for Cataract Surgery Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):4801.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Patient education strategies in cataract surgery have not been formally reviewed. To address this research gap, we compiled all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and evaluated the comparative effectiveness of interventions in cataract surgery patient education.

Methods : Systematic review of English-language RCTs using five electronic literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), with no restriction limits on date of publication. Quality appraisals were conducted for both individual studies and outcome-specific bodies of evidence, using the Oxford quality scoring system and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines, respectively.

Results : Out of 755 resultant records, 16 RCTs were eligible for review. Investigational interventions often supplemented interpersonal instruction with a visual, audio, and/or computer-based resource. Most trials (11/16; 69%) reported significantly greater efficacy (in at least one patient outcome) with delivery of the investigational intervention. Out of 21 total patient outcomes, consistent improvements in efficacy were noted for only the two knowledge outcomes: patient understanding of cataracts/cataract surgery and post-operative care. Poor GRADE ratings were observed for all multiple-study outcomes as well as for deciding to undergo cataract surgery (measured only in a single study).

Conclusions : Investigational interventions related to cataract surgery frequently optimized patient knowledge, but not other clinical, performance, or humanistic outcomes. The current evidence exhibits limited methodological quality, underscoring a need for more high-quality studies in patient education strategies for cataract surgery.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×