July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Foveal avascular zone in cases with epiretinal membrane or lamellar macular hole in the perioperative period
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ippei Takasu
    Takasu eye clinic, Okayama, Okayama, Japan
  • Takami Takasu
    Takasu eye clinic, Okayama, Okayama, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ippei Takasu, None; Takami Takasu, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 5264. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ippei Takasu, Takami Takasu; Foveal avascular zone in cases with epiretinal membrane or lamellar macular hole in the perioperative period. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):5264.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) or lamellar macular hole (LMH) before and after surgery.

Methods : Sixty five consecutive eyes of idiopathic ERM (44 eyes) and LMH (21 eyes) were studied retrospectively. Micro incision vitrectomy surgery was performed by one surgeon from December 2015 to March 2017. After vitrectomy, both the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and ERM were removed for ERM patients. For LMH patients, the ILM around fovea was removed, but the lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation (LHEP) was not removed and left around fovea. The LHEP was inverted to fill in a lamellar hole. Neither gas nor air was used for tamponade. Optic coherence tomography angiography images were captured with RTveu1000TM (Optoveu Inc. CA) and the FAZ areas of superficial capillary plexus were measured using ImageJ (NIH). FAZ area, best collected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured before the surgery and 1, 3 and 6 months after the surgery.

Results : In ERM patients, the FAZ area was 0.182 ± 0.105 (mean ± standard deviation) mm2 before the surgery and it reduced significantly at 1 and 3 months (0.142 ± 0.068 and 0.139 ± 0.073 mm2, p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) but not at 6 months (0.151 ± 0.086 mm2, p=0.39) after the surgery. Postoperative BCVA at each following visit improved significantly compared to preoperative BCVA and CMT reduced significantly from 355 ± 92 µm to 297 ± 54 µm at 6 months after operation (p<0.01). In LMH patients, the FAZ area was 0.355 ± 0.188 mm2 preoperatively and decreased to 0.296 ± 0.168 mm2 at 3 months after surgery (p<0.05). Postoperative BCVA at each following visit improved significantly compared to preoperative BCVA. CMT in LHMs was 203 ± 71 µm before surgery and didn’t change statistically in the postoperative period.

Conclusions : In ERM patients, the FAZ was small and thick. Even though membranes were removed by a surgery, the FAZ area remained small or became smaller after surgery and didn’t expand in most of the cases, although the thickened CMT became thinner at 6 months. Whereas, in LMH patients, the FAZ area was preoperatively larger than the normal FAZ area, which was 0.317 ± 0.129 mm2 in our preliminary study, and reduced its size at 3 months after the surgery, but the thickness was unchanged postoperatively.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×