Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 59, Issue 9
July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Characteristics of Fixational Eye Movements During Prolonged Recording
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Arun kumar Krishnan
    Envision Research Institute, Wichita, Kansas, United States
    School of Optometry, University of California , Berkeley, California, United States
  • Mehmet N Agaoglu
    School of Optometry, University of California , Berkeley, California, United States
    Vision Science Graduate Program, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States
  • Susana T L Chung
    School of Optometry, University of California , Berkeley, California, United States
    Vision Science Graduate Program, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Arun Krishnan, None; Mehmet Agaoglu, None; Susana Chung, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Bosma Enterprises Research Fellowship and NIH Grant R01-EY012810.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 5795. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Arun kumar Krishnan, Mehmet N Agaoglu, Susana T L Chung; Characteristics of Fixational Eye Movements During Prolonged Recording. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):5795.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Fixational eye movements (FEMs), comprising microsaccades, drifts and tremors, provide valuable information about oculomotor control and visual perception, and have been proposed as biomarkers for certain neurological and visual disorders. However, do the characteristics of FEMs change with fixation duration; and if so, what is the minimum duration for recording FEMs such that measurements of the characteristics of FEMs are stable?

Methods : Eye movements were recorded while subjects (n=9, aged 21-35) fixated binocularly on a high contrast 1° cross target for multiple trials of 70s, using three eye-trackers with different spatial and temporal resolution: Eyelink II (250Hz), Eyelink 1000 Plus (1000Hz) and a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO, eye positions sampled at 540Hz). After blink removal and denoising, a velocity-based algorithm was used to detect microsaccades and drifts in the eye-position traces throughout each 70s-trial. Characteristics of FEMs, including the rate and amplitude of microsaccades; duration and amplitude of drifts, were then determined for epochs that grew in in steps of 0.5s (0-0.5s, 0-1s, … 0-70s).

Results : Averaged across subjects, the rate of microsaccades was constant across epoch length, and ranged between 0.96/s and 1.44/s across the eye-trackers. The amplitudes of microsaccades, and drifts and drift duration changed with epoch length, especially over the first 25s. The duration of drifts increased systematically with epoch length until it reached saturation. An exponential fit to each subject’s data yielded an average time constants of 0.65, 7.05 and 6.61s respectively for EyeLinkII, EyeLink 1000 Plus and SLO. The saturation level of drift duration differed across eye-trackers (0.63–1.02s). For the amplitudes of microsaccades and drifts, they changed with epoch length non-systematically, but became stable for epoch length beyond ~25s. The SLO yielded the lowest estimates of drift durations, amplitudes of microsaccades and drifts once the values reached a plateau.

Conclusions : The characteristics of FEMs that we examined all showed stabilized values for epoch length over ~25s, suggesting that a minimum recording duration of 25s is required for us to reliably evaluate the characteristics of FEMs. The finding that these measurements differ with eye-trackers imply that the eye-tracker used should be considered when interpreting or comparing the characteristics of FEMs across studies.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×