Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 59, Issue 9
July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Analysis of the Relative Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty and Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Briana C. Gapsis
    Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Matthew Bickford
    Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Robert Allan Sharpe
    Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Sudeep Das
    Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Leah Kammerdeiner
    Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Matthew J. Nutaitis
    Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Briana Gapsis, None; Matthew Bickford, None; Robert Sharpe, None; Sudeep Das, None; Leah Kammerdeiner, None; Matthew Nutaitis, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 6090. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Briana C. Gapsis, Matthew Bickford, Robert Allan Sharpe, Sudeep Das, Leah Kammerdeiner, Matthew J. Nutaitis; Analysis of the Relative Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty and Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):6090.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the relative and combined effect of micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) in open angle glaucoma (OAG).

Methods : A retrospective review of change in IOP after MLT, SLT, and a joint SLT-MLT treatment regimen in patients with OAG. Patient age, characteristics of glaucoma, central corneal thickness (CCT), pre-operative and post-operative glaucoma medication, and average pre-operative and post-operative IOP were evaluated. All patients had undergone a standardized treatment regimen consisting of 50 spots per 180 degree treatment.

Results : 32 eyes from 22 patients underwent MLT. Median age was 69 years (range 56–91). Average CCT was 552±53. Mean pre-operative IOP was 19.6±4.9 mmHg and mean glaucoma medications were 1.9±1.2. Mean post-operative IOP was 15.4±2.4 mmHg, an 18% reduction in IOP from baseline (p = 0.0006). Subgroup analysis revealed 60% of patients underwent a 180 degree treatment with 14.5% reduction in IOP (p = 0.00015). 40% of patients underwent a 360 degree treatment with a 23.6% reduction in IOP (p = 0.0126). 31 eyes from 20 patients underwent SLT. Median age was 70 years (range 53 – 91). Average CCT was 530±28. Mean pre-operative IOP was 20.3±4.7 mmHg with 2.3±1.7 medications. Mean post-operative IOP was 16.3±2.6 mmHg, representing a 17.6% reduction from baseline IOP (p=0.00007). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that 56% of patients underwent a 180 degree treatment with a mean post-operative IOP reduction of 17% (p= 0.06) while 44% of patients underwent a 360 degree treatment with a mean IOP reduction of 17.8% (p = 0.00004). 16 eyes from 10 patients underwent 180 degree MLT and 180 degree SLT. Median age was 73 (range 60 – 83). Average CCT was 526±27. Mean pre-operative IOP was 20.0±4.6 and topical medications was 1.7±1.1. Mean post-operative IOP was 14.9±2.6 mmHg, or a 22.3% reduction in IOP (p = 0.00045). There were no statistically significant differences between the MLT, SLT, or joint MLT-SLT treatment regimen on IOP lowering or on topical medication use.

Conclusions : Laser trabeculoplasty, whether MLT, SLT, or a combination thereof, allows for effective lowering of intraocular pressure from baseline.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×