July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Ophthalmic surgical interventions following open globe repair in patients ultimately requiring enucleation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Adam Sweeney
    Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Aaron Y. Lee
    Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Eissa Hanna
    Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Adam Sweeney, None; Aaron Lee, None; Eissa Hanna, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 2312. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Adam Sweeney, Aaron Y. Lee, Eissa Hanna; Ophthalmic surgical interventions following open globe repair in patients ultimately requiring enucleation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):2312.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Following open globe repair (OGR), a minority of eyes undergo multiple surgeries with some ultimately requiring enucleation. The number and type of surgeries performed after OGR, however, is not well established. We performed a retrospective review seeking to describe the surgical interventions utilized before and after enucleation in patient eyes with initial OGR.

Methods : In this retrospective study, we evaluated all patients who underwent enucleation after OGR over a thirteen-year period (2002-2015) at a tertiary referral center. Exclusion criteria were lack of operative records, patients less than 18 years of age, and patients with aborted OGR or conversion to primary enucleation. Patients meeting the study criteria were evaluated for time between OGR and enucleation, surgeries performed prior to enucleation, and surgeries performed after enucleation.

Results : One hundred and forty-five patients underwent enucleation following OGR over the study period. The mean time between OGR and enucleation was 92 days (SD 365, range 2-3110). The median followup after enucleation was 85.5 days (SD 965, range 1-5285). Enucleation was the only surgery performed after OGR in 119 patients (82%). Eleven patients (8%) underwent at least one procedure prior to enucleation after OGR including pars plana vitrectomy (N=8), soft tissue reconstruction (N=2), and corneal laceration revision (N=1). Following enucleation after OGR, 19 patients required oculoplastic procedures including orbit/implant reconstruction (N=8), eyelid/soft tissue repair (N=7), or lacrimal drainage surgery (N=4). The incidence of oculoplastic surgery after enucleation increased substantially over longer followup, as seen on a Kaplan-Meier plot (figure 1).

Conclusions : Our study suggests that following OGR, it was rare for patients who ultimately received enucleation to have undergone further surgeries in attempt to save the eye. The most common procedures performed in this patient group after OGR were vitreoretinal and oculoplastic procedures. The rate of oculoplastic intervention following enucleation after OGR may suggest considerable complexities with enucleation in this patient population warranting extensive followup.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×