July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Predicting visual acuity outcomes in nAMD, RVO and DME by machine learning
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Amir Sadeghipour
    Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Sebastian M Waldstein
    Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Bianca S Gerendas
    Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Aaron Osborne
    Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
    Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Amir Sadeghipour, None; Sebastian Waldstein, Bayer (F), Bayer (C), Genentech (F), Novartis (C); Bianca S Gerendas, Roche (C); Aaron Osborne, Genentech (E); Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Bayer (C), Boehringer (C), Carl Zeiss Meditec (C), Novartis (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Christian Doppler Research Society, Genentech
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 1738. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amir Sadeghipour, Sebastian M Waldstein, Bianca S Gerendas, Aaron Osborne, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Predicting visual acuity outcomes in nAMD, RVO and DME by machine learning. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):1738.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Understanding and predicting functional outcomes in intravitreal pharmacotherapy is an important step to personalize therapies and to increase treatment efficiency. Our machine learning approach categorizes future change in BCVA from demographic and clinical data and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images. Analysis of learned models reveals the prediction power of OCT vs. non-OCT biomarkers.

Methods : Prospective phase III clinical trial data of 2555 patients with four leading exudative macular diseases (s. Table 1) were analyzed. We quantified more than 14,000 monthly acquired OCT scans by automatically segmenting retinal layers and intra- and subretinal fluid, and extracted OCT biomarkers such as fluid location, volume or the average thickness of retinal layers. We applied machine learning with Bayesian Networks to these and to the demographic and clinical data (e.g. age, gender, BCVA, treatment), to predict BCVA changes in two scenarios: First, we predicted them to month 3 (M3), year (Y) 1 and 2 from baseline (BL) visit data and second to Y1 and Y2 from the sequence of data to M3. We also evaluated and compared different models by changing the information presented to them in a 2-fold cross-validation setting.

Results : Table 1 shows BCVA prediction was more accurate for RVO and DME than for nAMD. Also, vision loss from BL is more reliably predicted than vision gain. By contrast, from M3 onwards vision gain achieved better or similar accuracy. Moreover, our analysis in Figure 1 shows:
● For DME, BCVA measurements and demographic data are more predictive than OCT biomarkers,
● For RVO and AMD, OCT biomarkers of BL scans are important in BCVA prediction and combining them with non-OCT features increases their accuracy, but they lose their importance to the non-OCT features from M3 onwards,
● OCT biomarkers from para- and perifoveal segments increase predictive power in all diseases, but predictions from M3 rely mostly on the foveal segment.

Conclusions : Prediction of BCVA outcome relies more on OCT biomarkers in RVO and nAMD than in DME. Machine learning identifies disease-specific variables for patient management and can guide the ophthalmologist in predicting clinical outcomes.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

 

Table 1: Classification of BCVA changes (in ETDRS letter score), as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Table 1: Classification of BCVA changes (in ETDRS letter score), as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

 

Figure 1: Prediction accuracy of BCVA gain > 5 (as AUC), given different input information.

Figure 1: Prediction accuracy of BCVA gain > 5 (as AUC), given different input information.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×