July 2018
Volume 59, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2018
Locomotor reproduction of memorized trajectories: where peripheral vision matters
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Colas Authié
    Streetlab, Paris, France
    Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06 & INSERM & CNRS & Centre Hospitalier National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingt, Paris, France
  • Alain Berthoz
    Equipe Pr Alain Berthoz Professeur Emérite au Collège de France, Paris, France
  • José-Alain Sahel
    Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06 & INSERM & CNRS & Centre Hospitalier National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingt, Paris, France
    Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Avinoam B Safran
    Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06 & INSERM & CNRS & Centre Hospitalier National d’Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingt, Paris, France
    Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Colas Authié, None; Alain Berthoz, None; José-Alain Sahel, None; Avinoam Safran, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) within the Investissements d’Avenir program (ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02 and ANR-15-RHUS- 0001). Grants from Humanis and la Fondation des Aveugles et Handicapés Visuels de France (FAF). Labex LIFESENSES (ANR-10-LABX-65). AB was supported by Collège de France.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2018, Vol.59, 5033. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Colas Authié, Alain Berthoz, José-Alain Sahel, Avinoam B Safran; Locomotor reproduction of memorized trajectories: where peripheral vision matters. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59(9):5033.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : During locomotion, we spontaneously anticipate our locomotor trajectory by head and gaze direction. This behavior is important to select visual information, simulate the future trajectory and stabilize the perception of space. However, in retinitis pigmentosa (RP), the loss of peripheral visual field (VF) leads to adaptive changes in sensory-motor coordination. Our objective is to determine whether theses adaptations can alter the usual gaze anticipation behavior, and therefore the trajectory execution.

Methods : Eight RP subjects presenting a VF limited to central 10-22° (diam.) and eight control subjects were asked to walk along two trajectories, previously shown on a sheet of paper (see Fig1.A). Whole body kinematics (Vicon, 120 Hz) and eye movements (Mocaplab eye-tracker, 60 Hz) were captured. Dependent variables include trajectory geometry (Fig1.C), walking speed, stepping parameters (Fig1.D), head and gaze anticipation (Fig1.B) and percentage of reverse-saccades (quick eye movements in the direction opposite to the path).

Results : Although no significant difference between groups was found in trajectory size, closing error was larger in RPs than in controls (Tab1). The walking speed was also reduced in RP group. No difference between groups was observed in all stepping parameters. On average, anticipatory eye and head movements in RP subjects were similar to those of controls. However, affected subjects demonstrated a larger proportion of reverse-saccades, leading to a sequence of back and forth gaze movements around future trajectory.

Conclusions : Loss of peripheral VF did not change usual anticipation behavior. However, RP patients occasionally interrupted their consistent anticipation by performing opposite rapid eye movements (reverse-saccades), presumably to update their postural reference frame and the egocentric distance to the planned trajectory. This behavior could be related to larger error in trajectory completion.

This is an abstract that was submitted for the 2018 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Honolulu, Hawaii, April 29 - May 3, 2018.

 

Fig1 A. Proposed trajectories presented to tested subjects. B. Gaze and head anticipation from pelvis heading. C. Top view of trajectory variables. D. Step parameters.

Fig1 A. Proposed trajectories presented to tested subjects. B. Gaze and head anticipation from pelvis heading. C. Top view of trajectory variables. D. Step parameters.

 

Table 1. Mean values (±SD) and statistical results. Anovas F values, significance level (p) and effect size (eta2) for each comparison are reported.

Table 1. Mean values (±SD) and statistical results. Anovas F values, significance level (p) and effect size (eta2) for each comparison are reported.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×