Although the trabecular meshwork (TM) has long been considered the primary site of outflow resistance, its surgical removal or bypass does not lower the IOP to the predicted level of episcleral venous pressure.
1–3 Recent laboratory studies showed that approximately 50% of outflow resistance is located further downstream.
4,5 Our clinical studies of plasma-mediated ab interno trabeculectomy (AIT) show that the outflow resistance distal to the TM is higher in eyes with glaucoma.
6–9 Only a small fraction of patients (∼0.3%) achieve the expected IOP.
9 In fact, an empirical formula predicts that patients cannot achieve an IOP lower than 18.6 mm Hg without additional aqueous suppressants
10 resulting in a failure rate of up to 30% within 12 months
6 for a target below 12 mm Hg in moderate to severe glaucoma. The pre- and postoperative IOP in AIT are correlated,
6 indicating an increased post-TM outflow resistance in eyes with a higher IOP. This suggests an incomplete understanding of outflow distal to the TM, and an avenue for new, targeted therapies. To explain the outflow resistance with the known numbers and diameters of distal outflow tract vessels,
11,12 it has been speculated that not all outflow channels may be patent at the same time, or they could constrict and dilate.
5,13,14 In theory, minute changes of small vessels, like collector channels (CC), could profoundly influence the facility. To generate the outflow resistance, they would have to have a diameter of only 20 μm, yet most have a diameter of approximately 50 μm or larger. A single vessel of this diameter could carry the entire flow,
5 a principle applied to ab interno microgel stents to allow for a slow and safe aqueous humor drainage from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space.
15 CC diameter changes from IOP variations
16 and with the cardiac pulse wave
17 do not explain the remaining distal outflow resistance, nor do valves at the orifices of collector channels
18 as their removal by deep sclerotomy fails to reduce IOP further.
19,20