As reviewed,
34 “drusen seen in blue light” reported in 1990
224 were called various names depending on detection technology and patient population,
225 finally settling on reticular pseudodrusen (viewed en face)
65 and SDD (viewed cross-sectionally).
66,67 In 1988 Sarks et al.
123 described by electron microscopy “focal collections of membranous debris”
123 in the subretinal space (see the Soft Drusen, BLinD: Lifelong Physiology, Uncovered by Aging section).
65 In a donor eye, Rudolf et al.
66 described regularly spaced deposits, distinct from photoreceptors and RPE. Definitive histology of clinical cases
122,226 established the presence of extracellular deposits. The association of SDD with atrophy,
227 intraretinal neovascularization,
228 and photoreceptor degeneration
229,230 indicates a place for SDD in the AMD spectrum.
1 Beyond location, SDD differs from soft drusen/BLinD (
Table 1) in lipid, protein, and mineral content, specificity for AMD, and association with neovascular subtypes.
34 A histologic survey of AMD donor eyes
225 showing that SDD was thickest in the perifovea, and that soft drusen/BLinD was thickest under the fovea, leading to a novel suggestion that deposits reflect differential physiology of rod and cone photoreceptors, respectively. Hypothesized driving pathways include lipid transport via lipoproteins (
Fig. 5) and/or interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein.
34 A comprehensive understanding of SDD molecular composition is urgently needed.