Previous studies have evaluated the superficial retinal vessel densities in the peripapillary region in PXG and have found them to be lower than the vessel densities in severity-matched POAG eyes. Suwan et al.
15 compared the peripapillary vessel densities in 43 PXG (mean MD = −7.4 dB) and 31 POAG eyes (mean MD = −9.3 dB) using custom software and found that the vessel densities were significantly less in the PXG eyes. The mean annular perfused capillary density was 30.7% in the PXG group versus 36.2% in POAG group (
P < 0.001). Similarly, all of the peripapillary sectors had significantly lower mean vessel densities in the PXG group (28.8%–34.8%) when compared with the POAG group (34.2%–39.2%).
15 One of the limitations of this study was a large difference in the mean age between the two groups (71.2 years in PXG vs. 60.7 years in POAG group,
P < 0.001). Another study by Park et al.
16 also compared the peripapillary vessel densities of the radial peripapillary capillary slab in 39 PXG (mean MD = −6.8 dB) and 39 POAG eyes (mean MD = −6.7 dB) using a swept-source OCTA device and custom software. These groups were matched not only for MD on VF but also for age, and the peripapillary vessel densities and RNFL thicknesses were evaluated in six sectors of the Garway-Heath map. They found that, although the mean vessel densities were lower in all of the sectors of the PXG group when compared with the POAG group, this difference was statistically significant only for the average (24.2% vs. 26.4%,
P = 0.048), nasal (23.3% vs. 26.3%,
P = 0.02) and infero-nasal (18.5% vs. 21.9%,
P = 0.043) sectors.
16 They also found that, although the groups were matched for glaucoma severity based on VFs, the nasal RNFL was thinner in the PXG eyes when compared with the POAG eyes. Therefore, the reduction in vessel density may have been secondary to the corresponding RNFL thinning—an association that was established earlier.
24 The strength of the present study, which found no difference in the vessel densities of the radial peripapillary capillary between the groups, was that the PXG and POAG groups had no significant difference in VF parameters or RNFL thickness. The other possible explanation for difference in results between the current study and those done previously is that we included large vessels as well as microvasculature in our measurement of vessel density. One may question why large vessels were included in our analyses. The reason for this was that several previous studies on PXF syndrome have shown it to be associated with systemic vasculopathies involving large vessels (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease) as well as ocular vasculopathies of large vessels (retinal vein occlusions and reduced retrobulbar circulation).
2,3 However, the current OCTA technology may not be sensitive enough to appreciate these changes in the large vessel flow and therefore no significant difference was seen between PXG and POAG in the present study. Recently, OCTA software has become available that allows the removal of large vessels while calculating vessel densities, and this has been shown to be more sensitive at identifying progression when compared with the analysis of all vessel (large vessels and capillaries) information.
25