July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Higher Order Aberration Measurement Comparison Between Scheimpflug and Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Technology in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Claudia Elena Perez Straziota
    Ophthalmology, USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • ANDRE LUIS PICCININI
    Ophthalmology, USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Oren Golan
    Ophthalmology, USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Emilio Almeida Torres-Netto
    Ophthalmology, USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Farhad Hafezi
    Ophthalmology, USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • James Bradley Randleman
    Ophthalmology, USC, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Claudia Perez Straziota, None; ANDRE PICCININI, None; Oren Golan, None; Emilio Torres-Netto, None; Farhad Hafezi, None; James Randleman, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness. USC affiliation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 344. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Claudia Elena Perez Straziota, ANDRE LUIS PICCININI, Oren Golan, Emilio Almeida Torres-Netto, Farhad Hafezi, James Bradley Randleman; Higher Order Aberration Measurement Comparison Between Scheimpflug and Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Technology in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):344.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the difference and agreement of total corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes using Scheimpflug and Dual Scheimpflug/Placido imaging systems.

Methods : One hundred and five healthy eyes screened for refractive surgery and 50 eyes diagnosed with keratoconus were evaluated sequentially by Scheimpflug and Dual Scheimpflug/Placido devices. Differences, correlations, and agreement between values for total root mean square (RMS), trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration were analyzed and Bland-Altmann plots generated to assess agreement of total corneal HOAs between these two devices.

Results : In normal eyes, total RMS, coma, and trefoil were significantly different between devices (p<0.001 for all), while spherical aberration values were not. There was moderate positive correlation between devices for trefoil, coma, and spherical aberration, and strong positive correlation for total cornea RMS. In keratoconic eyes, trefoil at 30 degrees, spherical aberration and total RMS were significantly different between devices (p<0.05), while trefoil at 0 degrees and total coma values were not. There was weak positive correlation between devices for trefoil, moderate positive correlation for horizontal coma, and for total cornea RMS, and strong positive correlation for vertical coma and spherical aberration.

Conclusions : Scheimpflug and Dual-Scheimpflug/Placido imaging devices generated statistically different values for total cornea higher-order aberrations for normal and keratoconic eyes. While correlation between devices were moderate to strong and a reasonable agreement were found in normal eyes, keratoconic eyes showed limited correlations and wide limits of agreement.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×