July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
The sensory specific effects of prescription-free motion sickness medication - eye movement responses to balance provoking stimulation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Tony Pansell
    Clnical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
    Neuro Ophthalmology, St Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Johanna Engström
    Clnical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Tobias Wibble
    Clnical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Tony Pansell, None; Johanna Engström, None; Tobias Wibble, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 537. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tony Pansell, Johanna Engström, Tobias Wibble; The sensory specific effects of prescription-free motion sickness medication - eye movement responses to balance provoking stimulation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):537.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Antihistamines make up the first line of treatment for nausea, vertigo and dizziness. The antiemetic mechanism is thought to be due to an inhibitory effect on the vestibular apparatus. A decrease in gain for the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) has been recorded after antihistamine administration during sinusoidal oscillation and rough-sea voyaging. Vestibular activation is reflected in ocular counter-rolling (OCR) and a physiological skew deviation during head tilt. This balance-specific combination of eye movements (EM) can also be triggered by visual stimulation alone. As vertigo is considered to be the result of a mismatch between sensory inputs, we have constructed a set of visual- and vestibular balance provoking stimuli, aiming to discern the effect of antihistamines on respective system.

Methods : 12 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to either placebo treatment (sugar pills) or antihistamine (Meclozine, 50mg) in this double-blinded study. Subjects were exposed to three balance provoking trials in a randomized order, i) visual (VIS), ii) vestibular (VES), and iii) visuo-vestibular (VIS-VES). EM were recorded using a Chronos Eye Tracker. VIS were presented and rotated on two meters distance. VES were carried out through whole-body tilting using a mechanical sled in complete darkness. VIS-VES involved being tilted while viewing a static visual scene. All tilts and rotations were carried out in a randomized order at two magnitudes (14°- and 28°s-2) with duration of 1 sec in order to simulate low- and high movement intensities. Trials were carried out both before and after treatment intervention in order to ascertain group uniformity. EM velocities were calculated in order to assess any treatment effect.

Results : No significant differences could be found between groups before treatment intervention. After treatment, the Meclozine group showed a significantly lower torsional velocities during VIS and VIS-VES stimulations of 14°s-2. There was no significant change in isolated vestibular provocations.

Conclusions : While the positive effects of Meclozine on motion sickness and vertigo have been assigned to an inhibitory effect on the vestibular apparatus, this study suggests that the effect rather lies in a reduced visional sensitivity to balance provocations. Additionally, the effect is only significant during low-intensity motion.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×