July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Structure and Function of Dysflective Cones in Healthy and Diseased Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ethan Bensinger
    School of Optometry and Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
  • Katharina G Foote
    School of Optometry and Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
    Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Jessica J. Wong
    Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Jacque L Duncan
    Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Austin Roorda
    School of Optometry and Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ethan Bensinger, C.Light Technologies (C), Spouse - C.Light Technologies (I), Spouse - C.Light Technologies (P); Katharina Foote, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (C); Jessica Wong, None; Jacque Duncan, AGTC (C), California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (C), Editas Medicine (C), Foundation Fighting Blindness (C), Foundation Fighting Blindness (S), Ionis Pharmaceuticals (C), Neurotech USA Inc (S), Novelion Therapeutics (C), ProQR Therapeutics (C), SparingVision (C), Spark Therapeutics (C); Austin Roorda, C.Light Technologies (I), USPTO#6,890,076 (P), USPTO#7,118,216 (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH R01EY023591; NIH T32EY007043; NIH P30EY003176; FDA Grant R01-41001; Lowy Medical Research Institute; Foundation Fighting Blindness; Research to Prevent Blindness Nelson Trust Award for Retinitis Pigmentosa and Unrestricted Funds; Claire Giannini Foundation; That Man May See, Inc.; Minnie Flaura Turner Memorial Fund for Impaired Vision Research Award
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 1031. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ethan Bensinger, Katharina G Foote, Jessica J. Wong, Jacque L Duncan, Austin Roorda; Structure and Function of Dysflective Cones in Healthy and Diseased Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):1031.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To characterize the structure and function of dysflective cones in normal subjects and in patients with Macular Telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel). Dysflective cones exhibit measurable function but are not seen in confocal adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) images and lack inner/outer segment junction and cone outer segment tip reflections in optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans.

Methods : AOSLO and Adaptive Optics Microperimetry (AOMP) were used to assess the structure and function of areas identified as possible dysflective cones in 3 healthy subjects and 2 patients. AOMP thresholds were measured with 543 nm light (equally sensed by L and M cones) and computed as the average of 2, 35-trial adaptive staircase (QUEST) sessions. Due to the small size of the dysflective areas in healthy eyes (average area of 8.3 arcmin2) AOMP utilized a stimulus size of less than 1 arcmin, and transverse chromatic aberration was measured before and after testing to confirm that the stimulus remained on target. Patients, who had larger dysflective regions, were tested with a stimulus size of 3.45 arcmin. Suspected dysflective and normal-appearing cones at similar eccentricities were tested in each group. Whenever possible, subjects were imaged with confocal AOSLO, split detector AOSLO, and OCT.

Results : All subjects had measurable function in the dysflective cone area. 2 of the 3 healthy subjects showed no difference in function in the dysflective area compared to adjacent areas. Cones in one healthy subject’s dysflective area regained normal reflective properties after 2 weeks. The 3rd healthy subject had 3x reduced sensitivity within the dysflective area. Both patients had reduced, but measurable, sensitivity within the dysflective area. One patient had no measurable sensitivity in the middle of the lesion but measurable sensitivity at the dysflective border. These corresponded to regions in the split-detection images without and with visible inner segments, respectively.

Conclusions : For the first time (i) dysflective cones have been identified in healthy subjects and (ii) we observe instances where dysflective cones in healthy subjects regain normal reflective properties. Finally, we used split detector imaging to further refine the dysflective cone phenotype in MacTel patients, and suggest that visible inner segments are present in dysflective cones with measurable function.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×