July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Assessing the Relative Frequency of Mobility Limitations in the Visually Impaired Population in the United States
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dean A VanNasdale
    Optometry, Ohio State Univ College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Lisa Jordan
    Optometry, Ohio State Univ College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Dean VanNasdale, None; Lisa Jordan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Association for Chronic Disease Directors/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 1386. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dean A VanNasdale, Lisa Jordan; Assessing the Relative Frequency of Mobility Limitations in the Visually Impaired Population in the United States. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):1386.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To assess the proportion of individuals reporting mobility limitations with and without vision impairment (VI) using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Methods :
Data from each of the 50 states were extracted from the 2015 BRFSS dataset. Self-report of difficulty seeing with or without glasses was used to categorize VI vs non-VI. Self-report of serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs was used to categorize those with mobility limitations vs those without. The proportion of those reporting mobility limitations was calculated for the VI and non-VI cohorts for each state. To assess the magnitude of any differences between the two populations, the ratio of limited mobility in the VI vs non-VI population was calculated for each state.

Results :
The rate of mobility limitations in the non-VI population ranged from 7% (Hawaii) to 16% (West Virginia). The rate of mobility limitations in the VI population was higher than in the non-VI population in all 50 states, ranging from 23% (Vermont) to 59% (North Dakota). The range in the ratio of mobility limitations in the VI vs the non-VI population ranged from 2.4 (Louisiana) to 7.4 (North Dakota).

Conclusions :
The BRFSS demonstrates a considerably higher rate of mobility limitations in the VI vs non-VI cohorts. This is consistent with higher risk of falls and fall-related injuries in the VI population. The magnitude of the mobility difference between the VI vs non-VI cohort demonstrates wide geographic variability, indicating a potential greater need for intervention strategies in states where mobility limitations in the VI population is highest.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×