July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
“MINIMAL IMAGE GAIN IN VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE. A comparison between graders and between systems
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Estefania Ibarra
    Ultrasound Department, Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Mexico
  • Guillermo Salcedo-Villanueva
    Retina, Asociación Para Evitr la Ceguera en México, Mexico
  • Mariana Mayorquin
    Ultrasound Department, Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Mexico
  • Manuel A. Trujillo-Alvarez
    Retina, Asociación Para Evitr la Ceguera en México, Mexico
  • Jessica Betancourt
    Ultrasound Department, Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Estefania Ibarra, None; Guillermo Salcedo-Villanueva, None; Mariana Mayorquin, None; Manuel A. Trujillo-Alvarez, None; Jessica Betancourt, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 1550. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Estefania Ibarra, Guillermo Salcedo-Villanueva, Mariana Mayorquin, Manuel A. Trujillo-Alvarez, Jessica Betancourt; “MINIMAL IMAGE GAIN IN VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE. A comparison between graders and between systems. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):1550.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : <p style="margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span style="font-family:helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:8.5pt; margin:0px"><font color="#000000">To determine Minimal Image Gain (MIG) in patients with vitreous hemorrhage (VH), and to compare variability between two non-experienced graders, and compare variability between two different ultrasound systems.</font></span></p>

Methods : Retrospective and comparative study of patients with VH assessed at the Ocular Ultrasound Department. MIG was determined using two systems, the Aviso S and Cine Scan. A 10 mega Hz B-scan ultrasound probe was used to evaluate the macular region, longitudinal section was made at 9 o’clock meridian for right eyes and 3 o’clock for left eyes. To obtain MIG the following method was proposed: The image was observed without additional zoom, and with the highest amount of gain in db. The scan's gain is lowered in orden to obtain a completely “echo-silent” vitreous cavity. This point is termed MIG and the db registered. The procedure was done by the two graders and in the two systems for every patient.
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was performed to determine inter-observer variability between graders and between systems.

Results : Sixteen eyes of 16 patients were analyzed. Mean MIG for Grader 1 in the Aviso: 61 db (47-85); Mean MIG for Grader 2 in the Aviso: 60 db (46-84); Mean MIG for Grader 1 in the Cinescan: 56 (32-78); Mean MIG for Grader 2 in the Cinescan: 57 (40-83). ICC for Grader 1 vs 2 in the Aviso: 0.876 for single measures (p<0.000), 0.934 for average measures (p>0.000), Cronbach’s Alpha 0.932. ICC for Grader 1 vs 2 in the Cinescan: 0.889 for single measures (p<0.000), 0.941 for average measures (p<0.000), Cronbach’s Alpha 0.941. ICC for Aviso vs Cinescan: 0.852 for single measures (p<0.000), 0.920 for average measures (p<0.000), Cronbach’s Alpha 0.949.

Conclusions : Conclusions: MIG measurements can be accurately performed in patients with VH. There is high agreement even in non-experienced graders and between systems.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×