July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy: Consequences of Inadvertent Treatment Interruptions
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mark W Johnson
    Ophthal & Visual Science, Univ of Michigan-Kellogg Eye Ctr, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Thomas Wubben
    Ophthal & Visual Science, Univ of Michigan-Kellogg Eye Ctr, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Mark Johnson, None; Thomas Wubben, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 1733. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mark W Johnson, Thomas Wubben; Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy: Consequences of Inadvertent Treatment Interruptions. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):1733.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Because the durability of anti-vascular endothial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is limited and patients with diabetes are prone to losses to follow-up, there is controversy regarding the role of anti-VEGF monotherapy in the treatment of ischemic diabetic retinopathy. We performed a retrospective, observational clinical study to investigate the consequences of inadvertent treatment interruptions in patients with diabetic retinopathy who are treated exclusively with anti-VEGF therapy.

Methods : The study design was a retrospective, multi-center, observational case series. We identified patients treated exclusively with anti-VEGF therapy for proliferative (PDR) or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), with or without diabetic macular edema (DME), and temporarily lost to follow-up. Baseline disease characteristics and treatment parameters, cause and duration of the treatment interruption, and resulting disease progression, complications, and outcomes were assessed by retrospective review of medical records.

Results : Thirteen eyes of 12 patients with type 2 diabetes were identified. Mean age was 57 ± 10 years and 50% were women. Anti-VEGF therapy was indicated for PDR with DME in 7 (54%) eyes, PDR without DME in 3 (23%) eyes, and moderate to severe NPDR with DME in 3 (23%) eyes. Eight eyes had visual acuity (VA) of 20/80 or better prior to treatment interruption. Median duration of treatment hiatus was 12 months. Reasons for treatment interruption included intercurrent illness (31%), noncompliance (31%), and financial issues (15%). Complications upon follow-up included vitreous hemorrhage (9 eyes), neovascular glaucoma (5 eyes), and traction retinal detachment (4 eyes). Despite treatment of these complications, 77% of eyes lost ≥3 lines of VA, with 46% of eyes having a final VA of hand motion or worse.

Conclusions : Diabetic patients are subject to significant lapses in follow-up because of illness, financial hardship, and/or noncompliance. In patients with diabetic retinopathy, especially proliferative disease, managed with anti-VEGF therapy alone, unintentional treatment interruptions can result in visually disastrous consequences, including irreversible blindness.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×