July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Differences in tear protein biomarkers between patients with Alzheimer’s disease and controls
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Marlies Gijs
    University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • Rudy M Nuijts
    University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • Inez Ramakers
    Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Netherlands
  • Frans Verhey
    Department of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Netherlands
  • Carroll A.B. Webers
    University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Marlies Gijs, None; Rudy Nuijts, None; Inez Ramakers, None; Frans Verhey, None; Carroll Webers, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 1744. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marlies Gijs, Rudy M Nuijts, Inez Ramakers, Frans Verhey, Carroll A.B. Webers; Differences in tear protein biomarkers between patients with Alzheimer’s disease and controls. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):1744.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Tears are valuable resources for biomarker research. Tear biomarkers have been identified for a number of ocular diseases as well as neurological diseases (migraine, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis). Up to date, no studies assessed the diagnostic potential of tear biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Given the pathological heterogeneity of AD and related dementias, the next generation of peripheral biomarkers must be able to characterize the individual's underlying pathophysiology. This requires an expansion of the biomarker panel beyond what is currently available. Developing these biomarkers will be critical for a broader characterization of pathology in patients with AD by identifying different patient sub-types based on biological phenomenon. We investigated the diagnostic potential of tears as source of peripheral biomarkers for AD.

Methods : We investigated the tear biomarker level of total-tau and amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42) in a cohort of 25 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), and nine age-matching healthy controls (HC). Tears were collected using Schirmer strips. The levels of tear total-tau and Aβ42 were examined using multiplex immunoassays from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD).

Results : The levels of tear total-tau and Aβ42 changed with increasing AD stage. The ability of tear total-tau and Aβ42 to discriminate between patients and controls (expressed as area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, or AUC) was 0.81 (95% CI 0.62-1.00, p=0.005) and 0.725 (95% CI 0.54-0.91, p= 0.058), respectively. Furthermore, a significant increase in total-tau in tears of AD patients compared with SCI patients (p=0.019) and with MCI patients (p=0.028) was demonstrated.

Conclusions : Our results suggest that tear total-tau and Aβ42 have reasonable discriminatory power for the AD state and the potential for utility as a diagnostic markers. However, a limitation of this study is the small sample size. Larger scale studies are required to confirm these results.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×