July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Comparison of Visual Performance of four types of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Farideh Doroodgar
    Tehran University of Medical Science, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
  • Farid Karimian
    Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
  • Sana Niazi
    Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
  • Azad Sanginabadi
    Iran University of Medical Science, Iran (the Islamic Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Farideh Doroodgar, None; Farid Karimian, None; Sana Niazi, None; Azad Sanginabadi, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 2047. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Farideh Doroodgar, Farid Karimian, Sana Niazi, Azad Sanginabadi; Comparison of Visual Performance of four types of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):2047.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The aim of study was to compare the clinical outcome of different multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with presbyopia or cataracts

Methods : 141 patients (282 eyes) with different multifocal intraocular lens IOLs included, Symfony (60 eyes), AcrySof ReSTOR (100 eyes), AT Lisa tri (60 eyes), PanOptix (62 eyes). Were evaluated in this prospective interventional study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03454334).The near, intermediate and distant visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, were measured as effective criteria

Results : The demonstrated clinical results here were excellent for four groups, however, there were also differences in group ReSTOR, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) for the intermediate at 60 cm and near at 40cm of the other groups showed less vision (P<0.001) also symphony group for far distance demonstrated less vision than other groups (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences by at lisa tri and PanOptix lens for visual acuity in all distance and eyes with the PanOptix and at lisa tri IOL showed better contrast sensitivity than ReSTOR and Symfony at spatial frequencies of 1 cpd and 3, 6 cpd (P<0.001) in photopic and mesopic conditions and no significant difference in other spatial frequencies.

Conclusions : Four groups multifocal lenses provided excellent distance, intermediate and near vision, but various measures demonstrated that the PanOptix and at lisa tri lens provided better vision in all distance. Spectacle freedom was significantly higher with four groups. MF IOL design perhaps plays a role in the post-operation result because better outcomes were received with diffractive lenses.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×