July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
AIs and dry eyes: the effects of aromatase inhibitors on signs and symptoms of dry eye
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Emma Gibson
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Fiona Stapleton
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Rachel Dear
    The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, New South Wales, Australia
  • Blanka Golebiowski
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Emma Gibson, None; Fiona Stapleton, None; Rachel Dear, None; Blanka Golebiowski, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 2750. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Emma Gibson, Fiona Stapleton, Rachel Dear, Blanka Golebiowski; AIs and dry eyes: the effects of aromatase inhibitors on signs and symptoms of dry eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):2750.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : This study is the first to look at signs of dry eye in women undergoing breast cancer treatment with Aromatase Inhibitors (AI). The purpose was to evaluate the effects of oestrogen suppression, with AI treatment, on symptoms and signs of dry eye in postmenopausal women. A sub-aim was to evaluate effects of treatment on ocular and systemic pain.

Methods : This was a cross-sectional, observational, single visit study. 56 postmenopausal women (mean age 64.1+7.9 years) and 52 age-matched postmenopausal women undergoing AI treatment for breast cancer (mean age 66.6+9.0; median duration of AI use 1.3 years, IQR=3.0) were recruited. Questionnaires were administered to assess pain (Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire [PSQ], Ocular Pain Assessment Survey [OPAS])and ocular surface symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-14 question [MGD14]). The presence of dry eye was determined by the OSDI. Eyelid margins (capping, telangiectasia), meibomian gland expressibility, tear break up time (NIBUT), tear volume (phenol red thread) and ocular surface staining (fluorescein, lissamine green) were evaluated. Differences between groups for frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms, MGD14 and pain questionnaire scores and clinical signs were evaluated using Chi-square, T-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results : Almost half of each group reported dry eye symptoms, defined as OSDI>12 (48% control, 46% AI). PSQ scores were significantly worse in the AI group (p=0.04). Frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms, MGD14 and ocular pain symptoms (OPAS) were not significantly different between women treated with AIs and untreated women. In the AI group, meibomian gland expressibility was significantly worse (p=0.003). There were no differences in any other clinical signs between groups.

Conclusions : Oestrogen suppression, with AI treatment, appears to reduce meibum expressibility and increase pain sensitivity. The frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms were not significantly different with AI treatment. Reduced meibum expressibility seen in women taking AI treatment, may result in reduced tear film stability and ocular surface irritation. Assessment of dry eye status and meibomian glands should be included in clinical consultations of women treated with AIs.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×