July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Intraocular lens(IOL) movement after normal and flipped implantation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Manqiang Peng
    Central South University, Changsha, China
    Changsha Aier Hospital, China
  • Libei Zhao
    Central South University, Changsha, China
  • Muhammad Ahmad Khan
    Central South University, Changsha, China
  • Ding Lin
    Central South University, Changsha, China
    Changsha Aier Hospital, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Manqiang Peng, None; Libei Zhao, None; Muhammad Ahmad Khan, None; Ding Lin, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 3172. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Manqiang Peng, Libei Zhao, Muhammad Ahmad Khan, Ding Lin; Intraocular lens(IOL) movement after normal and flipped implantation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):3172. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the effect of flipped implantation on the movement of ArySof IQ IOL.

Methods : 20 New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups of A and B. 10 rabbits in group A and 10 in group B. All the rabbits underwent phacoemulsification and Acysof IQ(SN60WF+20D) IOL implantation. We performed normal IOL implantation in group A and flipped implantation in group B. 14 days after surgery, we measured the intraocular lens movement induced by pilocarpine with Lenstar LS 900. The forward movement of intraocular lens was recorded as “+” while backward movement was recorded as “-”.

Results : All the IOLs were implanted in the capsular bag. No complication occurred during the surgery. 3 rabbits were excluded due to anterior chamber exudation which interfering the measurement of intraocular lens position. 2 in group A and 1 in group B. There were no difference between the two groups in age, gender(p>0.05). The movements in group A were -0.32mm to 0.11mm, with an average of -0.18±0.04mm. There was only one move forward in group A. The movements in group B were 0.04mm to 0.36mm, with an average of 0.17±0.05mm. The difference of movement between the two groups was significant(p<0.05).

Conclusions : The IOL movement was different after normal and flipped implantation. The intraocular lens mainly move backward after normal implantation while mainly move forward after flipped implantation.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×