July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Rate of Remission after Immunomodulatory Therapy for Uveitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Deep Parikh
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Northwell Health System, New York City, New York, United States
  • Shreyas Menon
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Northwell Health System, New York City, New York, United States
  • Marta Fabrykowski
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Northwell Health System, New York City, New York, United States
  • Tiffany Truong
    New York Medical College, New York, United States
  • Jason Chua
    Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, United States
  • C. Michael Samson
    Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital, Northwell Health System, New York City, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Deep Parikh, None; Shreyas Menon, None; Marta Fabrykowski, None; Tiffany Truong, None; Jason Chua, None; C. Michael Samson, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 3524. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Deep Parikh, Shreyas Menon, Marta Fabrykowski, Tiffany Truong, Jason Chua, C. Michael Samson; Rate of Remission after Immunomodulatory Therapy for Uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):3524.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Uveitis is the third leading cause of blindness in the U.S. with over 35,000 new patients diagnosed each year. Immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) such as mycophenolate and methotrexate (MTX) has been used safely for the last two decades but practice patterns differ and there is a paucity of data on the length of drug-free remission obtained after discontinuation of these medications.

Methods : A retrospective, observational clinical study was performed identifying 26 patients seen at the Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital Uveitis Department between 2017 and 2018. All patients were previously treated with either MMF or MTX with an average of ten year follow-up after cessation of IMT, with a minimum of five years. This is the longest follow-up period after IMT cessation of any prior studies.

Results : 22 patients (84.62%) successfully maintained remission after discontinuation of IMT with an average follow up of 10.38 years since discontinuation. Of these 22 patients, 11 required no further steroid drops during the follow up period, 5 were maintained on chronic steroid drops, and 6 were successfully treated with steroid drops for acute episodes. 4 patients (15.38%) underwent relapse eventually requiring restarting IMT. Relapse occurred in these patients after an average of 9.63 years of being in remission. For all 26 patients, average duration of treatment with IMT was 3.38 years. No trend was noted regarding duration of treatment and duration of remission.

Conclusions : After a limited duration of treatment with MMF or MTX for uveitis, a majority of patients were able to achieve remission of their disease during the ten year follow-up period. This information is useful for ophthalmologists and patients to understand and quantify the long term benefits of treating uveitis with IMT. Future research will help us identify which patients are more likely to relapse and/or which patients may require longer treatment with IMT.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×