July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Impact of total keratometry estimated by the Abulafia-Koch formula versus anterior keratometry on refractive results of an intraocular toric implant in cataract surgery.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • ANTOINE LEVRON
    OPHTALMOLOGY, HOPITAL D'INSTRUCTION DES ARMEES DESGENETTES, Lyon, France
  • Hussam El Chehab
    OPHTALMOLOGY, HOPITAL D'INSTRUCTION DES ARMEES DESGENETTES, Lyon, France
  • Emilie Agard
    OPHTALMOLOGY, HOPITAL D'INSTRUCTION DES ARMEES DESGENETTES, Lyon, France
  • Mayeul Chaperon
    OPHTALMOLOGY, HOPITAL D'INSTRUCTION DES ARMEES DESGENETTES, Lyon, France
  • Roman Chudzinski
    OPHTALMOLOGY, HOPITAL D'INSTRUCTION DES ARMEES DESGENETTES, Lyon, France
  • Corinne Dot
    OPHTALMOLOGY, HOPITAL D'INSTRUCTION DES ARMEES DESGENETTES, Lyon, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   ANTOINE LEVRON, None; Hussam El Chehab, None; Emilie Agard, None; Mayeul Chaperon, None; Roman Chudzinski, None; Corinne Dot, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 3692. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      ANTOINE LEVRON, Hussam El Chehab, Emilie Agard, Mayeul Chaperon, Roman Chudzinski, Corinne Dot; Impact of total keratometry estimated by the Abulafia-Koch formula versus anterior keratometry on refractive results of an intraocular toric implant in cataract surgery.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):3692.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare refractive results of a toric intraocular implant (HOYA® XY1A) after cataract surgery with or without Abulafia-Koch formula adjustment in the specific calculator of the implant (HOYA® V4)

Methods : A retrospective case series. Eyes having cataract surgery with IOL toric implantation (XY1A HOYA®) calculated with the V4 HOYA® toric calculator were divided in two groups: with Abulafia-Koch formula adjustment in group 1, and without Abulafia-Koch formula in group 2. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), pre-operative corneal astigmatism, post-operative subjective total astigmatism, post-operative rotation, and predictive error in residual astigmatism were compared between the two groups.

Results : 53 eyes were included. Groups were comparable regarding axial length, pre-operative corneal astigmatism, and post-operative IOL rotation. UDVA was 0.07 +/-0.02 log MAR in group 1 and 0.13+/-0.02 log MAR in group 2 (p=0.08). Residual refractive astigmatism was not significantly different between the 2 groups, 0.23+/-0.05 D in group 1 and 0.35+/-0.07 D in group 2 (p=0.2), respectively. Sphere equivalent was significantly better in group 1, 0.07+/-0.06 D than in group 2, -0.36+/-0.12 D (p=0.001) Posterior corneal astigmatism estimated by Abulafia-Koch formula gave a better predictability of residual postoperative astigmatism with the V4 HOYA® calculator. Predictive error, defined as the difference between the residual cylinder estimated by V4 HOYA® calculator and the residual post-operative subjective cylinder, was better in group 1, 0.07 +/-0.06 D (p=0.22) than in group 2, 0.25 +/-0.07 D (p=0.03).

Conclusions : Our study suggests that spherical equivalent and predictability of postoperative residual cylinder are significantly improved when the total corneal astigmatism is estimated by the Abulafia-Koch formula associated with V4 HOYA® calculator.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×