July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Did the anti-VEGF therapy actually change the long-term prognosis of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion patients?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • SeungHyun Lee
    Department of Ophthalmology and Inha Vision Science Laboratory, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Myung Hun Yoon
    Department of Ophthalmology and Inha Vision Science Laboratory, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Hee Seung Chin
    Department of Ophthalmology and Inha Vision Science Laboratory, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   SeungHyun Lee, None; Myung Hun Yoon, None; Hee Seung Chin, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 4062. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      SeungHyun Lee, Myung Hun Yoon, Hee Seung Chin; Did the anti-VEGF therapy actually change the long-term prognosis of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion patients?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):4062.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate the changes in treatment trends and evaluate prognosis according to that among patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) for 10 years.

Methods : A retrospective clinical charts review of patients diagnosed with BRVO in Inha University Hospital was performed from January 2006 to December 2017. The patients were divided into two groups based on the period when the rate of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin®) treatment was over half of patients.

Results : A total of 186 eyes from 186 patients with BRVO were divided into two groups, as of 2010, when the use of intravitreal bevacizumab treatment exceeded 50% of patients. Before 2010, 57 patients were included in Group A and 129 patients were included in Group B since 2010. The sex ratio (male/female) was 25/32 in Group A and 48/81 in Group B (p=0.418). The mean age of onset of BRVO was 59.03±13.67 years in Group A and 61.31±11.34 years in Group B (p=0.239). The most common underlying disease was hypertension (Group A: 63.15%, Group B: 58.13%; p=0.627). There was no statistical difference in the initial logMAR visual acuity between the two groups (Group A:0.52±0.39, Group B: 0.48±0.39; p=0.542). In Group A, 33.33% of patients received intravitreal bevacizumab treatment, and 21.05% of patients received laser treatment (Grid/Focal laser). In Group B, 72.09% of patients received intravitreal Bevacizumab treatment, and 8.52% of patients received laser treatment. The mean follow-up period of Group A and B was 24.54±29.16 months and 15.09±15.75 months, respectively (p=0.05). The mean length of period until visual acuity was stabilized was 10.14±17.51 months in Group A and 7.80±10.54 months in Group B, but there were no statistical differences between two groups (p=0.26). The difference between final logMAR visual acuity and initial logMAR visual acuity was -0.08±0.36 in Group A and -0.16±0.32 in Group B, but there were no statistical differences between two groups (p=0.164).

Conclusions : Since 2010, the main modality of treatment for macular edema secondary to BRVO has been changed from laser into intravitreal anti-VEGF in our hospital. But there was no statistical difference in prognosis of final visual acuity and the length of period until visual acuity was stabilized in spite of change of treatment trends.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×