July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Efficacy of aberrometry-based binocular refraction compared with subjective refraction in keratoconus patients.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Gonzalo Carracedo
    Optometry and Vision, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Carlos Carpena Torres
    Optometry and Vision, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Maria Serramito
    Optometry and Vision, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Ana Privado Aroco
    Optometry and Vision, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Maria Rodriguez Lafora
    Optometry and Vision, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Teresa Espinosa Vidal
    Optometry and Vision, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Laura Batres Valderas
    Optometry and Vision, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Gonzalo Carracedo, None; Carlos Carpena Torres, None; Maria Serramito, None; Ana Privado Aroco, None; Maria Rodriguez Lafora, None; Teresa Espinosa Vidal, None; Laura Batres Valderas, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 4841. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gonzalo Carracedo, Carlos Carpena Torres, Maria Serramito, Ana Privado Aroco, Maria Rodriguez Lafora, Teresa Espinosa Vidal, Laura Batres Valderas; Efficacy of aberrometry-based binocular refraction compared with subjective refraction in keratoconus patients.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):4841.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new system of binocular refraction, mainly based on ocular aberrometry, (BROA) and to compare with the traditional subjective refraction (SR) in patients with keratoconus.

Methods : Prospective, double blind and transversal study was performed. It was recruited 50 keratoconus patients with mean age of 36.10 ± 10.20 years old (age range: 24 to 51 years). SR was performed by two different optometrists and BROA by other optometrist (three times), randomly. Neither patients nor optometrist knew the refraction achieved by the others. For statistical analysis, the refraction was converted to vectorial parameters (M, J0 and J45). Then, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective vision evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), refraction spent time and M, J0 and J45 were analyzed. Student t-test for related samples were used to compare the efficacy between binocular refraction based on aberrometry and subjective refraction. Data are represented as mean ± SD and p value<0.05 were consider statistically significant

Results : The vectorial parameters of refraction was found very similar between both methods studied, without statistically differences (p>0.05). For M, was found -3.15 ± 4.05 D and -2.98 ± 3.63 D for BROA and SR, respectively. Both refraction methods showed similar BCVA, being 0.09 ± 0.19 LogMAR for binocular refraction based on aberrometry and 0.04±0.17 for SR (p>0.05). The main difference was found in the spent time to perform the refraction. The time spent with BROA was 5.07 ± 1.24 minutes meanwhile it was 7.37 ± 2.31 minutes for SR, being statistically significant (p<0.05). Regarding the VAS, the mean score was 81.12 ± 17.03 and 81.29 ± 18.54 for BROA and SR, respectively, without significant differences (p>0.05).

Conclusions : The BROA shows an excellent repeatability and a similar behavior than SR, spending less chair time. The BROA seems to be a good tool for refraction for keratoconus patients.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×