July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Higher-Order Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Fluid Burden Assessment: Analysis From the OSPREY Extended Phase
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Atsuro Uchida
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Julie Clark
    Novartis Pharmaceuticals, New Jersey, United States
  • Sunil K Srivastava
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Natalia Albuquerque Lucena Figueiredo
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Amy Babiuch
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Katherine Elizabeth Talcott
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Leina Lunasco
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Thuy Le
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Alison Rogozinski
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Jamie L. Reese
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Justis P Ehlers
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Atsuro Uchida, None; Julie Clark, None; Sunil Srivastava, Allergan (F), Bausch and Lomb (C), Gilead (F), Leica (P), Regeneron (F), Santen (C); Natalia Figueiredo, None; Amy Babiuch, Genentech (C); Katherine Talcott, None; Leina Lunasco, None; Thuy Le, None; Alison Rogozinski, None; Jamie Reese, None; Justis Ehlers, Aerpio (C), Aerpio (F), Alcon (F), Alimera (C), Allergan (C), Boerhinger Ingelheim (F), Genentech (C), Leica (C), Leica (P), Novartis (C), Novartis (F), Regeneron (F), Roche (C), Santen (C), Thrombogenics (C), Thrombogenics (F), Zeiss (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH/NEI K23-EY022947-01A1, RPB Institutional Grant, Novartis NPC1807JE.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 5188. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Atsuro Uchida, Julie Clark, Sunil K Srivastava, Natalia Albuquerque Lucena Figueiredo, Amy Babiuch, Katherine Elizabeth Talcott, Leina Lunasco, Thuy Le, Alison Rogozinski, Jamie L. Reese, Justis P Ehlers; Higher-Order Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Fluid Burden Assessment: Analysis From the OSPREY Extended Phase. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):5188.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Current conventional OCT metrics are traditionally limited to global measures of retinal thickness or retinal volume. These metrics do not provide insight regarding specific underlying pathologic features, such as quantifying intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF). Higher-order OCT assessment enables in-depth evaluation of Spectral Domain-OCT (SD-OCT) imaging biomarkers for therapeutic effect, including volumetric and area measurements of IRF/SRF. This analysis evaluated the fluid burden metrics in the OSPREY phase II trial for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) following treatment with brolucizumab or aflibercept during the extended phase.

Methods : The OSPREY trial is a phase II randomized, double-masked, active-controlled study of 56 weeks’ duration comparing brolucizumab to aflibercept in nAMD. In OSPREY, nAMD subjects were randomized 1:1 to brolucizumab 6 mg or aflibercept 2 mg, both at q8w dosing through Week 40 after 3 monthly loading doses. The final cycle was extended in the brolucizumab group for assessment of q12w dosing, with the aflibercept group maintained on q8w dosing. Weeks 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, and 56 were selected as timepoints for higher-order OCT analysis to provide information on differential responses at extended-interval dosing. Macular cube scans were uploaded into a novel analysis software platform, and macular IRF volume, macular central foveal IRF area (single B-scan fluid area), and macular SRF volume were quantified using an advanced-analysis algorithm.

Results : Eyes that perform optimally to q12w dosing with brolucizumab may be identified, as well as eyes at risk for fluid rebound with extended interval dosing. Baseline features that may be predictive of tolerance at various treatment intervals will be evaluated. This analysis will also enable comparative assessment of fluid dynamics during treatment with q12w brolucizumab and q8w aflibercept.

Conclusions : Following anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD, varying degrees of fluid frequently persist. In this study, a novel OCT analysis approach enabled volumetric characterization of IRF/SRF. This allows for a unique assessment of persistent fluid and provides opportunities for identification of imaging biomarkers that may predict optimal response to therapeutics, and determination of best dosing regimens and overall prognosis.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×