July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
De-insured Routine Eye Exams Significantly Reduced the Use of Government-insured Optometrists but Increased the Use of Government-insured Primary Care Providers for Ocular Diagnoses
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yaping Jin
    Ophthalmology & Vis Sci, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • William Jeon
    Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Rick H Glazier
    University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Michael Brent
    Ophthalmology & Vis Sci, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Yvonne M Buys
    Ophthalmology & Vis Sci, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Graham E Trope
    Ophthalmology & Vis Sci, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yaping Jin, None; William Jeon, None; Rick Glazier, None; Michael Brent, None; Yvonne Buys, None; Graham Trope, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 5447. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yaping Jin, William Jeon, Rick H Glazier, Michael Brent, Yvonne M Buys, Graham E Trope; De-insured Routine Eye Exams Significantly Reduced the Use of Government-insured Optometrists but Increased the Use of Government-insured Primary Care Providers for Ocular Diagnoses. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):5447.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : In 2004, Ontario de-insured routine eye exams for individuals aged 20-64 unless they had a diagnosed eye disease, diabetes or obtained a valid physician referral. We investigated if de-insurance affected Ontarian’s use of government-insured services provided by optometrists and primary care providers (PCPs, including family physicians, paediatricians and nurse practitioners).

Methods : OHIP (Ontario Health Insurance Plan) billing data from 2000 to 2014 were analyzed. Included were individuals without diabetes and/or a visit to an OHIP-insured ophthalmologist/optometrist one year prior to the study year. The use of OHIP-insured services provided by optometrists and PCPs for eye diagnoses was compared post- vs. pre-2004 using the interrupted time-series analysis. Eye disease diagnoses were identified using ICD-9 codes. Diabetes was excluded and included as a part of eye diagnoses. Practitioner’s specialty was recognized using specialty codes.

Results : A significant decrease was seen in use of OHIP-insured optometric services post- vs. pre-2004 among de-insured age group when diabetes was excluded as a part of eye diagnoses: -57% (p<0.0001) for the 20-39 group and -42% (p<0.0001) for the 40-64 group. Among de-insurance unaffected 0-19 and 65+ groups, a non-significant change was observed (p>0.05) in use of OHIP-insured optometric services.

The use of OHIP-insured PCP services for eye diagnoses post- vs. pre-2004 among de-insured age groups increased significantly: +30% (p<0.0001) for the 20-39 group, and +16% (p<0.0001) for the 40-64 group. This increase was observed in males, females and all income earners. Among de-insurance unaffected age groups changes in use of PCPs for eye diagnoses were non-significant (p>0.05 for both 0-19 and 65+ group).

The use of PCPs for non-ocular diagnoses remained stable post- vs. pre-2004 in both de-insurance affected and unaffected individuals.

Trends were similar when diabetes was included as a part of eye diagnoses.

Conclusions : Post-delisting, OHIP claims by optometrists decreased significantly while PCP claims for ocular diagnoses increased among de-insured Ontarians. Due to different levels of equipment and skills among PCPs compared with optometrists, the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of increased use of PCPs for eye diagnosis and management warrants further investigation.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×