July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Cost analysis of disposable versus non-disposable instruments for oculoplastics minor operations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christine Anggun Putri
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffiled, United Kingdom
  • Parushak Rezai
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffiled, United Kingdom
  • Zanna Currie
    Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffiled, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Christine Anggun Putri, None; Parushak Rezai, None; Zanna Currie, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 5456. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christine Anggun Putri, Parushak Rezai, Zanna Currie; Cost analysis of disposable versus non-disposable instruments for oculoplastics minor operations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):5456.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : In the current tough economic climate, it is important to provide quality care with limited resources. Our department in a tertiary center in United Kingdom, currently utilizes non-disposable instruments for oculoplastics minor operations and these instruments are sterilized off-site. A snapshot audit of the instruments revealed issues such as missing and damaged instruments. Disposables surgical instruments are increasingly being used for their reliability and prevention of cross-infection. We performed a cost-analysis study to determine the most cost-effective alternative of instruments for oculoplastics minor operations in our department.

Methods : A cost analysis was performed comparing non-disposable versus disposable instruments over a 10-year period. The initial purchase cost of chalazion sets, lid surgery sets and other instruments; sterilization cost; repair cost and replacement cost were included for non-disposable instruments cost calculcation. Quoted purchase price of similar sets of instruments and estimated disposal cost were included for disposable instruments cost calculation.

Results : The total cost of non-disposable instruments over 10 years was £174,044 (equivalent to US$ 223,181). The estimated cost of disposable instruments was £448,267 (equivalent to US$ 574,823). Potentially, an additional £274,223 (equivalent to US$ 351,642) would be spent over 10 years if disposables were used instead of non-disposables in our department.

Conclusions : Non-disposable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for oculoplastics minor operations in our department. Reusing non-disposable instruments is better for minimizing the carbon footprint of the NHS (National Health Service). Although there have been no reports of adverse outcomes or patient dissatisfaction related to defective non-disposable instruments, stricter sterilization, inspection, repair and replacement processes should be trialed to ensure instrument reliability and good delivery of care.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×