July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Evaluating Ophthalmic Surgical Efficiency through the Stellaris® Platform: The Impact of Surgeon Volume and Gauge Size on Pars Plana Vitrectomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Naveen Karthik
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Valeri Kolesnitchenko
    Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
  • Ronald Cummings-Kralik
    Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
  • Brian McCary
    Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
  • Sunil K Srivastava
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Naveen Karthik, None; Valeri Kolesnitchenko, Bausch + Lomb (E); Ronald Cummings-Kralik, Bausch + Lomb (E); Brian McCary, Bausch + Lomb (E); Sunil Srivastava, Allergan (F), Bausch + Lomb (C), Bausch + Lomb (F), Clearside (C), Eyepoint (C), Gilead (C), Optos (C), Regeneron (C), Regeneron (F), Sanofi (C), Santen (C), Santen (F), Zeiss (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 5802. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Naveen Karthik, Valeri Kolesnitchenko, Ronald Cummings-Kralik, Brian McCary, Sunil K Srivastava; Evaluating Ophthalmic Surgical Efficiency through the Stellaris® Platform: The Impact of Surgeon Volume and Gauge Size on Pars Plana Vitrectomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):5802.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To assess the impact of surgical volume on ophthalmic surgeon efficiency and the relative efficiency of gauge size in pars plana vitrectomy surgeries performed on the Bausch + Lomb Stellaris® PC platform.

Methods : Machine logistics of Bausch + Lomb’s Stellaris® devices were collected from over 1,550 machines across multiple institutions and included 114,737 posterior ophthalmic surgeries conducted by 2,278 surgeons from 2002 to 2017. Descriptive statistical analysis was then performed on the collected data. Surgical volume was classified into three groups: high volume (HV) (≥ 20 surgeries per month), intermediate volume (IV) (6 to 19), and low volume (LV) (≤ 5). Surgical measures, including surgery time, laser, aspiration and vitrectomy parameters, were compared based on surgeon volume and gauge (G) size.

Results : HV surgeons had the lowest average surgical effective time (51.0±34.0 min, N=25,780) compared to IV (57.1±35.7 min, N=52,607) and LV (71.4±48.0 min, N=34,199) surgeons (P<0.01). IV surgeons had the lowest average vitrectomy time (373.7±300.5 sec, N=48,873) versus HV (394.1±289.4 sec, N=23,866) and LV (450.2±361.5 sec, N=30,960) surgeons (P < 0.01). LV surgeons had a higher average aspirating duration (621.5±495.2 sec, N=31,422) than either IV (504.4±372.6 sec, N=49,496) or HV (506.4±358.3 sec, N=24,243) surgeons (P<0.01). LV surgeons also had higher average surgical laser time and higher average power settings than either IV or HV surgeons (P<0.01). On average, 25G surgeries required the least amount of fluid (51.9 mL, N=25,022) compared to 23G (63.8±38.9 mL, N=45,962) and 20G (70.8±42.9 mL, N=22,455) surgeries (P<0.01). 25G surgeries also had a shorter average vitrectomy time (349.0±266.9 sec, N=27,366) compared to 23G (409.9±324.3 sec, N=51,527) or 20G (440.5±352.2 sec, N=24,157) surgeries (P<0.01). Finally, HV surgeons using 25G needles had higher average cut rates during surgery (4244±834.0 cuts/min) than those using 23G (3778±1365 cuts/min) or 20G (3268±1465 cuts/min) needles (P<0.01).

Conclusions : In this large vitrectomy surgery database, high volume ophthalmic surgeons had the greatest measures of surgical efficiency based on vitrectomy parameters collected by the Stellaris® machines. Additionally, 25G surgeries were associated with the lowest average fluid usage and shortest average vitrectomy time compared to other gauges.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×