July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Our experience with retinopathy of prematurity: a retrospective computerized database review
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sarah Chorfi
    University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Patrick Hamel
    University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Fallaha Nicole
    University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Luis Ospina
    University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Caroline Bélanger
    University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Rosanne Superstein
    University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    McGill University, Quebec, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sarah Chorfi, None; Patrick Hamel, None; Fallaha Nicole, None; Luis Ospina, None; Caroline Bélanger, None; Rosanne Superstein, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 6513. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sarah Chorfi, Patrick Hamel, Fallaha Nicole, Luis Ospina, Caroline Bélanger, Rosanne Superstein; Our experience with retinopathy of prematurity: a retrospective computerized database review. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):6513.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Analyzing the practices at our institution for screening, treatment and follow-up of patients with retinopathy of prematurity during their hospitalization at the neonatal intensive care unit. We performed a retrospective review of all patients examined in the neonatal intensive care unit of our institution for retinopathy of prematurity between August 2009 and November 2018.

Methods : Data was extracted from a computerized database in which information about all patients seen in the neonatal intensive care unit of our institution has been continuously updated since 2008. We computed a total of 1493 patients and 6648 exams in our database

Results : A proportion of 15.26% of our patients had 20 to 26 weeks of gestation age, 71.08% had 26 to 32 weeks, 13.25% had 32 to 38 weeks and 0.40% had 38 to 44 weeks. None of our patients developed disease severity of stage 4 or 5 during their follow-up. The average follow-up interval for stage 1, 2 and 3 respectively was 10.28 +/- 7.34 days, 6.58 +/- 2.44 and 3.97 +/- 2.39. The average follow-up interval in a subgroup of patients for whom disease progression was noted between two visits was 9.48 +/- 4.20 days. There was no statistical difference between the average follow-up intervals among our team of attending physicians in this subgroup of patients. Disease progression occurred between 2 and 8 weeks of age in 21.19% of cases, between 8 and 16 weeks of age in 66.38% of cases and between 16 and 24 weeks in 11.33% of cases. Patients for whom laser treatment was indicated had 23 to 27 weeks of gestation age.

Conclusions : Progression was recorded between follow-up intervals of less than two weeks in average which highlights the importance of periodic follow-up. The fact none of our patients developed stage 4 or 5 disease is an encouraging finding.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×