July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Visual acuity incompletely represents visual function in patients after successful repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macular involvement
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Heijan Ng
    Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute , Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Koenraad Arndt Vermeer
    Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute , Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Jan van Meurs
    The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Netherlands
  • Ellen La Heij
    The Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Netherlands
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Heijan Ng, None; Koenraad Vermeer, None; Jan van Meurs, None; Ellen La Heij, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Stichting Ooglijders, Stichting Wetenschappelijk Ondezoek Oogziekenhuis
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 6570. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Heijan Ng, Koenraad Arndt Vermeer, Jan van Meurs, Ellen La Heij; Visual acuity incompletely represents visual function in patients after successful repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macular involvement. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):6570.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macular involvement (RRDMI) has a high success rate, but postoperative visual function varies. Metamorphopsia and aniseikonia are known postoperative complaints, though previous studies into the incidence of these complaints are variable in results. We performed a prospective observational study to quantify postoperative metamorphopsia and aniseikonia after anatomically successful surgery for RRDMI and to correlate these variables with postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

Methods : For this study we included 40 patients who had successful surgery for unilateral RRDMI. Both eyes, RRDMI eye and fellow eye, were assessed 6 months postoperatively. BCVA was measured using ETDRS chart. Metamorphopsia was subjectively scored as present or absent and aniseikonia was subjectively scored as absent, micropsia or macropsia. In 15 patients, metamorphopsia and aniseikonia were quantified in horizontal and vertical direction using M-CHARTS and New Aniseikonia Test.
Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-square test were used to evaluate differences between RRDMI and fellow eye. Correlations between the degree of metamorphopsia and aniseikonia with BCVA were evaluated by Spearman's correlation coefficient.

Results : Six months after surgery, BCVA between RRDMI eyes (0.13 ± 0.30 LogMAR)(median ± IQR) and fellow eyes (-0.06 ± 0.10 LogMAR) differed significantly (p <0.001). Metamorphopsia was more often reported in RRDMI eyes (87.5%) than in fellow eyes (0%) (p<0.001). Aniseikonia was reported as micropsia in 28 patients (70%), absent in 12 patients (30%) and never as macropsia.
Horizontal and vertical metamorphopsia were 1.13 ± 0.71° (mean ± SD) and 0.89 ± 0.57°. Horizontal and vertical aniseikonia were -1.0 ± 6.0% (median ± IQR) and -1.0 ± 2.0%. BCVA was neither correlated with the degree of metamorphopsia nor with the degree of aniseikonia.

Conclusions : Despite successful surgery for RRDMI, a large majority of patients experience metamorphopsia (87.5%) and micropsia (70.0%). As the severity of metamorphopsia and aniseikonia shows no correlation to BCVA, merely measuring BCVA seems inadequate for an assessment of visual function.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×