July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
The effects of fine motor hobbies on cataract surgical simulator performance.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Laura Palazzolo
    Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York, United States
  • Anna Kozlova
    Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York, United States
  • Allison E Rizzuti
    Ophthalmology, SUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Laura Palazzolo, None; Anna Kozlova, None; Allison Rizzuti, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 470. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Laura Palazzolo, Anna Kozlova, Allison E Rizzuti; The effects of fine motor hobbies on cataract surgical simulator performance.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):470.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To determine if prior experience with fine motor hobbies influences a surgeon-in-training’s performance on a cataract surgical simulator.

Methods : Medical students performed the Navigation, Forceps, and Capsulorhexis modules on the Eyesi Ophthalmosurgical Simulator (Figure 1). Each task was performed twice and scores out of 100% were recorded. Following simulation, a survey was administered regarding prior experience with various fine motor hobbies including musical instruments, video games, drawing, and extracurricular anatomy dissection. Prior experience observing and assisting cataract surgery was also recorded.

Results : 70 medical students were recruited (male N=43, female N=27, mean age=24). Of the fine motor hobbies assessed, medical students with extracurricular dissection experience, including work in research laboratories involving animal dissection, scored significantly higher on the simulator (Forceps p=0.004, Capsulorhexis p=0.05; Figures 2 and 4). In addition, medical students with drawing experience performed better on Capsulorhexis (p=0.01; Figures 3 and 4). No other fine motor hobbies were significant for improving scores on the simulator tasks (Figure 4). Participants with prior experience assisting cataract surgery did significantly better on the Capsulorhexis simulation (N=2, p=0.04).

Conclusions : Medical students with experience in drawing and fine dissection, as well as those who assisted cataract surgery previously, scored significantly higher on at least one simulator task. Students with experience playing musical instruments or video games did not score higher. Our conclusions differ from previous research, which found a significant effect of video game playing on cataract surgery simulation (1). Our findings may have implications for predicting microsurgical skill during the selection of ophthalmology residents.

Citations:
1. Chung AT, Lenci LT, Wang K, et al. Effect of fine-motor-skill activities on surgical simulator performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):915-922.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

Figure 1. Eyesi ophthalmosurgical simulator tasks. A. Navigation, B. Forceps, C. Capsulorhexis. Photo Sources: Eyesi by VR Magic Surgical Simulator Courseware Guide.
Figure 2. Extracurricular Dissection Experience. * = p < 0.05

Figure 1. Eyesi ophthalmosurgical simulator tasks. A. Navigation, B. Forceps, C. Capsulorhexis. Photo Sources: Eyesi by VR Magic Surgical Simulator Courseware Guide.
Figure 2. Extracurricular Dissection Experience. * = p < 0.05

 

Figure 3. Drawing Experience. * = p < 0.05
Figure 4. Average scores on ophthalmosurgical simulator tasks for “Experience” and “No Experience” participants. *p=<0.05.

Figure 3. Drawing Experience. * = p < 0.05
Figure 4. Average scores on ophthalmosurgical simulator tasks for “Experience” and “No Experience” participants. *p=<0.05.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×