July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Transient pupillary light reflexes driven by foveal cones in CEP290- or in NPHP5-associated LCA-ciliopathies
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Arun kumar Krishnan
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Jason Charng
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Samuel G Jacobson
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Alejandro J Roman
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Alexandra Garafalo
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Alexander Sumaroka
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Malgorzata Swider
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Evelyn Semenov
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Rebecca Sheplock
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Elise Heon
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Artur V Cideciyan
    Scheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Arun Krishnan, None; Jason Charng, None; Samuel Jacobson, None; Alejandro Roman, None; Alexandra Garafalo, None; Alexander Sumaroka, None; Malgorzata Swider, None; Evelyn Semenov, None; Rebecca Sheplock, None; Elise Heon, None; Artur Cideciyan, ProQR (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Institutes of Health (EY-017549); ProQR Therapeutics; Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 1833. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Arun kumar Krishnan, Jason Charng, Samuel G Jacobson, Alejandro J Roman, Alexandra Garafalo, Alexander Sumaroka, Malgorzata Swider, Evelyn Semenov, Rebecca Sheplock, Elise Heon, Artur V Cideciyan; Transient pupillary light reflexes driven by foveal cones in CEP290- or in NPHP5-associated LCA-ciliopathies. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):1833. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To identify photoreceptors driving the transient pupillary light reflex (TPLR) in ciliopathy patients selected for similarity in phenotype.

Methods : Patients with severe blindness due to CEP290 (n=3) or NPHP5 (n=3) mutations were evaluated. Full-field stimulus test (FST; Diagnosys) thresholds and TPLR (Roland Consult) were recorded from 11 eyes sequentially with red (R) and blue (B) stimuli under dark-adapted conditions. Stimuli were 0.2 or 1 s long for FST and TPLR, respectively. TPLR response amplitude and latency were quantified as a function of luminance and compared to FST thresholds.

Results : CEP290 patients had Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA); NPHP5 patients had LCA and nephronophthisis. FST thresholds were -1.2 (SE= ±0.06, R) or -1.3 (±0.04, B) log cd.m-2. Perimetry showed small cone-mediated islands centered at the fovea; there was no peripheral vision. TPLR intensity response functions had a threshold of -1.31 (±0.19, R) or -1.28 (±0.11, B) log cd.m-2 to reach a criterion amplitude of 0.3 mm when measured at the fixed time of 0.9 s after stimulus onset; the maximum response amplitudes were 1.5 (±0.18, R) or 1.9 (± 0.16, B) mm (Fig panels A-C). B minus R differences for TPLR amplitude fluctuated near zero for all luminances except for the highest (2.7 log cd.m-2) stimulus where B responses were larger. There was evidence of increasingly greater B-R differences at times later than 0.9 s. TPLR latency to reach criterion amplitude of 0.3 mm was 0.81 (±0.03, R) or 0.83 (±0.05, B) s at -1.3 log cd.m-2 (panels A, C, D); there was progressive acceleration with intensity such that latency reached 0.46 (±0.02, R) or 0.44 (±0.02, B) s with maximal stimuli. Normal thresholds, amplitudes, B-R differences and latencies (panels B, D, dashed lines) were substantially different than patients.

Conclusions : Luminances corresponding to perceptual (FST) or criterion (TPLR) thresholds were nearly identical and photopically matched suggesting foveal cone mediation for both tests in patients. Normal FST and TPLRs at threshold were likely mediated by rods. Beyond threshold, TPLR responses of patients could be quantified for an additional 4 log units of range. TPLR latency was likely driven by foveal cones at threshold and beyond. TPLR amplitude at 0.9 s was driven by cones for the first 3 log units with evidence of melanopic signaling at 4 log above threshold.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×